ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Optimizing timing for quantification of intracranial aneurysm enhancement: a multi-phase contrast-enhanced vessel wall MRI study.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serial changes and optimal imaging windows in vessel wall MRI for unruptured intracranial artery dissection.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- The Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Vessel Wall MRI for Diagnosing Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) on high-resolution contrast-enhanced vessel wall MRI (VWMRI) is an emerging biomarker for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) stability. Quantification methods of AWE in the literature, however, are variable. We aimed to determine the optimal post-contrast timing to quantify AWE in both saccular and fusiform IAs. MATERIALS AND
methodsConsecutive patients with unruptured IAs were prospectively recruited. VWMRI was acquired on 1 pre-contrast and 4 consecutive post-contrast phases (each phase was 9 min). Signal intensity values of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and aneurysm wall on pre- and 4 post-contrast phases were measured to determine the aneurysm wall enhancement index (WEI). AWE was also qualitatively analyzed on post-contrast images using previous grading criteria. The dynamic changes of AWE grade and WEI were analyzed for both saccular and fusiform IAs.
resultsThirty-four patients with 42 IAs (27 saccular IAs and 15 fusiform IAs) were included. The changes in AWE grade occurred in 8 (30%) saccular IAs and 6 (40%) in fusiform IAs during the 4 post-contrast phases. The WEI of fusiform IAs decreased 22.0% over time after contrast enhancement (p = 0.009), while the WEI of saccular IAs kept constant during the 4 post-contrast phases (p > 0.05).
conclusionsWhen performing quantitative analysis of AWE, acquiring post-contrast VWMRI immediately after contrast injection achieves the strongest AWE for fusiform IAs. While the AWE degree is stable for 36 min after contrast injection for saccular IAs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The standardization of imaging protocols and analysis methods for AWE will be helpful for imaging surveillance and further treatment decisions of patients with unruptured IAs. KEY POINTS: Imaging protocols and measurements of intracranial aneurysm wall enhancement are reported heterogeneously. Aneurysm wall enhancement for fusiform intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is strongest immediately post-contrast, and stable for 36 min for saccular IAs. Future multi-center studies should investigate aneurysm wall enhancement as an emerging marker of aneurysm growth and rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.