Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38856885›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2024

A randomized controlled trial of shared decision-making treatment planning process to enhance shared decision-making in patients with MBC.

Gabrielle B Rocque, Noon Eltoum, Nicole E Caston, Courtney P Williams, Marian M Oliver, Lauren Moradi, Stacey Ingram, Andres Azuero, Maria Pisu, Smita Bhatia

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03806738 (Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03806738 nacompletednot on this map

Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamRan2018 to 2022Enrolled140ConditionsShared Decision MakingArmsIntervention-specific Carevive questionnaire, Standard of Care questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. "We are champions": an investigation on how cancer support group propels patient advocacy, voices, education, mentorship, and support.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gabrielle B RocqueO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. grocque@uabmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4188-9785
Noon EltoumDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Nicole E CastonDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Courtney P WilliamsO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Marian M OliverDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Lauren MoradiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Stacey IngramDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Andres AzueroSchool of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Maria PisuO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Smita BhatiaO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.

Funding

AHRQ HHS T32 HS013852American Cancer Society MRSG- 17-051-01 -PCSM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOpportunities exist for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to engage in shared decision-making (SDM). Presenting patient-reported data, including patient treatment preferences, to oncologists before or during a treatment plan decision may improve patient engagement in treatment decisions.

methodsThis randomized controlled trial evaluated the standard-of-care treatment planning process vs. a novel treatment planning process focused on SDM, which included oncologist review of patient-reported treatment preferences, prior to or during treatment decisions among women with MBC. The primary outcome was patient perception of shared decision-making. Secondary outcomes included patient activation, treatment satisfaction, physician perception of treatment decision-making, and use of treatment plans.

resultsAmong the 109 evaluable patients from December 2018 to June 2022, 28% were Black and 12% lived in a highly disadvantaged neighborhood. Although not reaching statistical significance, patients in the intervention arm perceived SDM more often than patients in the control arm (63% vs. 59%; Cramer's V = 0.05; OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.55-2.57). Among patients in the intervention arm, 31% were at the highest level of patient activation compared to 19% of those in the control arm (V = 0.18). In 82% of decisions, the oncologist agreed that the patient-reported data helped them engage in SDM. In 45% of decision, they reported changing management due to patient-reported data.

conclusionsOncologist engagement in the treatment planning process, with oncologist review of patient-reported data, is a promising approach to improve patient participation in treatment decisions which should be tested in larger studies.

trial registrationNCT03806738.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDecision Making, SharedPatient ParticipationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient Care PlanningPatient PreferencePhysician-Patient RelationsMetastatic breast cancerPatient-reported dataShared decision-makingTreatment planning

Identifiers

PMID38856885
PMCPMC11208240

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.