Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38857991›Full record

ReviewBMJ sexual & reproductive health2024

Association between COVID-19 vaccination and menstruation: a state of the science review.

Laura A Payne, Lauren A Wise, Amelia K Wesselink, Siwen Wang, Stacey A Missmer, Alison Edelman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ sexual & reproductive health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura A PayneMcLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA LPayne@mclean.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5999-9101
Lauren A WiseBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Amelia K WesselinkBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Siwen WangHarvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Stacey A MissmerHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alison EdelmanOregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Funding

An internet-based preconception cohort study in North America and DenmarkR01HD086742 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI LAUREN A WISE · 2016 to 2026
$6.7M
What is Endometriosis? Deep Phenotyping to Advance Diagnosis and TreatmentR01HD094842 · NICHD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FAZLEABAS, ASGERALLY T., MISSMER, STACEY ANN · 2018 to 2022
$4.2M
Pharmacogenomics of an ovulation modulator and the impact on delay of ovulationR01HD105866 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ALISON B EDELMAN, Jon D Hennebold · 2022 to 2026
$4.1M
Inflammatory Processes in Adolescent Girls with Primary DysmenorrheaR01HD093680 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PAYNE, LAURA A · 2018 to 2023
$3.6M
Infertility History and Chronic Disease ProfileR01HD096033 · NICHD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RISINGER, JOHN IAN · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
Improving emergency contraceptive effectiveness in obese womenR01HD089957 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI EDELMAN, ALISON B · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086742NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD089957NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093680NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD094842NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD096033NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD105866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMenstrual health is a key patient-reported outcome beyond its importance as a general indicator of health and fertility. However, menstrual function was not measured in the clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines. The purpose of this review was to synthesise the existing literature on the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual health outcomes.

methodsA PubMed search to 31 October 2023 identified a total of 53 publications: 11 prospective cohort studies, 11 retrospective cohort studies or registry-based cohort studies, and 31 cross-sectional or retrospective case-control studies.

resultsIdentified studies were generally at moderate-to-high risk of bias due to retrospective design, interviewer bias, and failure to include a non-vaccinated control group. Nonetheless, the bulk of the literature demonstrates that COVID-19 vaccine is associated with temporary changes in menstrual characteristics (cycle length and flow) and menstrual pain. Follicular phase (at the time of vaccination) is associated with greater increases in cycle length. Evidence suggests temporary post-vaccine menstrual changes in adolescents, abnormal vaginal bleeding in postmenopausal individuals, and a potential protective effect of using hormonal contraception.

conclusionsIn this review we found evidence supporting an association between the COVID-19 vaccine and menstrual health outcomes. Given the importance of menstrual function to overall health, we recommend that all future vaccine trials include menstruation as a study outcome. Future vaccine studies should include rigorous assessment of the menstrual cycle as an outcome variable to limit sources of bias, identify biological mechanisms, and elucidate the impact of stress.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesMenstruationFemaleHumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Reproductive Health

Identifiers

PMID38857991
PMCPMC11246222

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.