Observational studyBMJ open2024
Neonatal Resuscitation Online Registry in Shenzhen: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, open, observational cohort study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPreterm birth complications and neonatal asphyxia are the leading causes of neonatal mortality worldwide. Surviving preterm and asphyxiated newborns can develop neurological sequelae; therefore, timely and appropriate neonatal resuscitation is important to decrease neonatal mortality and disability rates. There are very few systematic studies on neonatal resuscitation in China, and its prognosis remains unclear. We established an online registry for neonatal resuscitation in Shenzhen based on Utstein's model and designed a prospective, multicentre, open, observational cohort study to address many of the limitations of existing studies. The aim of this study is to explore the implementation and management, risk factors and outcomes of neonatal resuscitation in Shenzhen. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective, multicentre, open, observational cohort study will be conducted between January 2024 and December 2026 and will include >1500 newborns resuscitated at birth by positive pressure ventilation at five hospitals in Shenzhen, located in the south-central coastal area of Guangdong province, China. Maternal and infant information, resuscitation information, hospitalisation information and follow-up information will be collected. Maternal and infant information, resuscitation information and hospitalisation information will be collected from the clinical records of the patients. Follow-up information will include the results of follow-up examinations and outcomes, which will be recorded using the WeChat applet 'Resuscitation Follow-up'. These data will be provided by the neonatal guardians through the applet on their mobile phones. This study will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the implementation and management, risk factors and outcomes of neonatal resuscitation in Shenzhen; the findings will ultimately contribute to the reduction of neonatal mortality and disability rates in Shenzhen. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Shenzhen Luohu People's Hospital (2023-LHQRMYY-KYLL-048). We will present the study results at academic conferences and peer-reviewed paediatrics journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300077368.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.