Evidence mapPaperPMID 38858520Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2024

Oculomics analysis in multiple sclerosis: Current ophthalmic clinical and imaging biomarkers.

Alex Suh, Gilad Hampel, Aditya Vinjamuri, Joshua Ong, Sharif Amit Kamran, Ethan Waisberg, Phani Paladugu, Nasif Zaman, Prithul Sarker, Alireza Tavakkoli and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alex SuhTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. asuh@tulane.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7241-0994
Gilad HampelTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Aditya VinjamuriTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Joshua OngMichigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sharif Amit KamranHuman-Machine Perception Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1681-9438
Ethan WaisbergUniversity College Dublin School of Medicine, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8999-0212
Phani PaladuguBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nasif ZamanHuman-Machine Perception Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.
Prithul SarkerHuman-Machine Perception Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6290-5484
Alireza TavakkoliHuman-Machine Perception Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9460-1269
Andrew G LeeCenter for Space Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by inflammation, demyelination, and axonal damage. Early recognition and treatment are important for preventing or minimizing the long-term effects of the disease. Current gold standard modalities of diagnosis (e.g., CSF and MRI) are invasive and expensive in nature, warranting alternative methods of detection and screening. Oculomics, the interdisciplinary combination of ophthalmology, genetics, and bioinformatics to study the molecular basis of eye diseases, has seen rapid development through various technologies that detect structural, functional, and visual changes in the eye. Ophthalmic biomarkers (e.g., tear composition, retinal nerve fibre layer thickness, saccadic eye movements) are emerging as promising tools for evaluating MS progression. The eye's structural and embryological similarity to the brain makes it a potentially suitable assessment of neurological and microvascular changes in CNS. In the advent of more powerful machine learning algorithms, oculomics screening modalities such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), eye tracking, and protein analysis become more effective tools aiding in MS diagnosis. Artificial intelligence can analyse larger and more diverse data sets to potentially discover new parameters of pathology for efficiently diagnosing MS before symptom onset. While there is no known cure for MS, the integration of oculomics with current modalities of diagnosis creates a promising future for developing more sensitive, non-invasive, and cost-effective approaches to MS detection and diagnosis.

Indexed as

BiomarkersMultiple SclerosisTomography, Optical CoherenceEye DiseasesEye-Tracking TechnologyHumansTearsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID38858520
PMCPMC11427571

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.