Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38859575›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024

Information Bottleneck Approach for Markov Model Construction.

Dedi Wang, Yunrui Qiu, Eric R Beyerle, Xuhui Huang, Pratyush Tiwary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unveiling hidden intermediate states in protein folding with AI-based conditional transition clustering.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Enhanced Sampling and Free Energy Calculations in Protein Simulations.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Unsupervised learning of structural relaxation in supercooled liquids from short-term fluctuations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dedi WangBiophysics Program and Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7524-5809
Yunrui QiuDepartment of Chemistry, Theoretical Chemistry Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-2200-0490
Eric R BeyerleInstitute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5717-3197
Xuhui HuangDepartment of Chemistry, Theoretical Chemistry Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7119-9358
Pratyush TiwaryDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry and Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2412-6922

Funding

Supplement to promote diversity: From atoms to mechanisms - Artificial Intelligence augmented molecular simulations for mechanistic ligand design.R35GM142719 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI TIWARY, PRATYUSH · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
Theory and Modeling of Functional Conformational Changes of RNA Polymerases_Diversity SupplementR01GM147652 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Xuhui Huang · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM147652NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Markov state models (MSMs) have proven valuable in studying the dynamics of protein conformational changes via statistical analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. In MSMs, the complex configuration space is coarse-grained into conformational states, with dynamics modeled by a series of Markovian transitions among these states at discrete lag times. Constructing the Markovian model at a specific lag time necessitates defining states that circumvent significant internal energy barriers, enabling internal dynamics relaxation within the lag time. This process effectively coarse-grains time and space, integrating out rapid motions within metastable states. Thus, MSMs possess a multiresolution nature, where the granularity of states can be adjusted according to the time-resolution, offering flexibility in capturing system dynamics. This work introduces a continuous embedding approach for molecular conformations using the state predictive information bottleneck (SPIB), a framework that unifies dimensionality reduction and state space partitioning via a continuous, machine learned basis set. Without explicit optimization of the VAMP-based scores, SPIB demonstrates state-of-the-art performance in identifying slow dynamical processes and constructing predictive multiresolution Markovian models. Through applications to well-validated mini-proteins, SPIB showcases unique advantages compared to competing methods. It autonomously and self-consistently adjusts the number of metastable states based on a specified minimal time resolution, eliminating the need for manual tuning. While maintaining efficacy in dynamical properties, SPIB excels in accurately distinguishing metastable states and capturing numerous well-populated macrostates. This contrasts with existing VAMP-based methods, which often emphasize slow dynamics at the expense of incorporating numerous sparsely populated states. Furthermore, SPIB's ability to learn a low-dimensional continuous embedding of the underlying MSMs enhances the interpretation of dynamic pathways. With these benefits, we propose SPIB as an easy-to-implement methodology for end-to-end MSM construction.

Indexed as

Markov ChainsMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID38859575
PMCPMC11199095

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.