ReviewPeerJ2024
Research advances in predicting the expansion of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage based on CT images: an overview.
Review in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Review of risk factors and prediction models for multidrug-resistant bacterial pulmonary infections in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Establishment and verification of a clinical prediction model for hematoma expansion in the acute phase of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage: neuroimaging biomarkers, radiomics-based prediction models, and clinical translation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Concurrent Utilization of Mannitol and Nimodipine in Treating Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Its Effects on Neurological Function.Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology · 2025Article
- Risk factors and preventive strategies for postoperative cerebral infarction in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance and clinical applications of artificial intelligence for intracranial bleeding detection: A meta-analysis.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Outcomes, neurological function, and inflammation indices following minimally invasive hematoma removal in hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hematoma expansion (HE) is an important risk factor for death or poor prognosis in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). Accurately predicting the risk of HE in patients with HICH is of great clinical significance for timely intervention and improving patient prognosis. Many imaging signs reported in literatures showed the important clinical value for predicting HE. In recent years, the development of radiomics and artificial intelligence has provided new methods for HE prediction with high accuracy. Therefore, this article reviews the latest research progress in CT imaging, radiomics, and artificial intelligence of HE, in order to help identify high-risk patients for HE in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.