ReviewExpert opinion on drug discovery2024
Computer-aided drug discovery strategies for novel therapeutics for prostate cancer leveraging next-generating sequencing data.
Review in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2024
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionProstate cancer (PC) is the most common malignancy and accounts for a significant proportion of cancer deaths among men. Although initial therapy success can often be observed in patients diagnosed with localized PC, many patients eventually develop disease recurrence and metastasis. Without effective treatments, patients with aggressive PC display very poor survival. To curb the current high mortality rate, many investigations have been carried out to identify efficacious therapeutics. Compared to de novo drug designs, computational methods have been widely employed to offer actionable drug predictions in a fast and cost-efficient way. Particularly, powered by an increasing availability of next-generation sequencing molecular profiles from PC patients, computer-aided approaches can be tailored to screen for candidate drugs. AREAS COVERED: Herein, the authors review the recent advances in computational methods for drug discovery utilizing molecular profiles from PC patients. Given the uniqueness in PC therapeutic needs, they discuss in detail the drug discovery goals of these studies, highlighting their translational values for clinically impactful drug nomination. EXPERT OPINION: Evolving molecular profiling techniques may enable new perspectives for computer-aided approaches to offer drug candidates for different tumor microenvironments. With ongoing efforts to incorporate new compounds into large-scale high-throughput screens, the authors envision continued expansion of drug candidate pools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.