Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38862945›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Utilization of machine learning for dengue case screening.

Bianca Conrad Bohm, Fernando Elias de Melo Borges, Suellen Caroline Matos Silva, Alessandra Talaska Soares, Danton Diego Ferreira, Vinícius Silva Belo, Julia Somavilla Lignon, Fábio Raphael Pascoti Bruhn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bianca Conrad BohmLaboratory of Veterinary Epidemiology, Postgraduate Program in Veterinary, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Capão do Leão, RS, Brazil. biankabohm@hotmail.com.
Fernando Elias de Melo BorgesAutomation Department, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Suellen Caroline Matos SilvaLaboratory of Veterinary Epidemiology, Postgraduate Program in Veterinary, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Capão do Leão, RS, Brazil.
Alessandra Talaska SoaresLaboratory of Veterinary Epidemiology, Graduate Program in Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Pelotas, Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Danton Diego FerreiraAutomation Department, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Vinícius Silva BeloFederal University of São, João del-Rei, Midwest Dona Lindu campus, Divinópolis, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Julia Somavilla LignonLaboratory of Veterinary Epidemiology, Postgraduate Program in Veterinary, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Capão do Leão, RS, Brazil.
Fábio Raphael Pascoti BruhnLaboratory of Veterinary Epidemiology, Preventive Veterinary Department, Federal University of Pelotas,, Capão do Leão, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior , Brasil 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue causes approximately 10.000 deaths and 100 million symptomatic infections annually worldwide, making it a significant public health concern. To address this, artificial intelligence tools like machine learning can play a crucial role in developing more effective strategies for control, diagnosis, and treatment. This study identifies relevant variables for the screening of dengue cases through machine learning models and evaluates the accuracy of the models. Data from reported dengue cases in the states of Rio de Janeiro and Minas Gerais for the years 2016 and 2019 were obtained through the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (SINAN). The mutual information technique was used to assess which variables were most related to laboratory-confirmed dengue cases. Next, a random selection of 10,000 confirmed cases and 10,000 discarded cases was performed, and the dataset was divided into training (70%) and testing (30%). Machine learning models were then tested to classify the cases. It was found that the logistic regression model with 10 variables (gender, age, fever, myalgia, headache, vomiting, nausea, back pain, rash, retro-orbital pain) and the Decision Tree and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) models achieved the best results in decision metrics, with an accuracy of 98%. Therefore, a tree-based model would be suitable for building an application and implementing it on smartphones. This resource would be available to healthcare professionals such as doctors and nurses.

Indexed as

DengueMachine LearningMass ScreeningBrazilDecision TreesHumansArbovirusesArtificial intelligenceClinical signsHealthcare systems

Identifiers

PMID38862945
PMCPMC11167742

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.