Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38864811›Full record

ReviewInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024

A Clinician's Guide to Sharing Data for AI in Ophthalmology.

Nayoon Gim, Yue Wu, Marian Blazes, Cecilia S Lee, Ruikang K Wang, Aaron Y Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nayoon GimDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Yue WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Marian BlazesDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Cecilia S LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Ruikang K WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Aaron Y LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

Aging eyes and aging brains in studying alzheimer's disease: Modern ophthalmic data collection in the adult changes in thought (ACT) studyR01AG060942 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Cecilia Sungmin Lee · 2019 to 2026
$39.4M
Bridge2AI:Salutogenesis Data Generation ProjectOT2OD032644 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AYYAGARI, RADHA, BAHMANI, AMIR · 2022 to 2025
$32.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060942NIH HHS OT2 OD032644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data is the cornerstone of using AI models, because their performance directly depends on the diversity, quantity, and quality of the data used for training. Using AI presents unique potential, particularly in medical applications that involve rich data such as ophthalmology, encompassing a variety of imaging methods, medical records, and eye-tracking data. However, sharing medical data comes with challenges because of regulatory issues and privacy concerns. This review explores traditional and nontraditional data sharing methods in medicine, focusing on previous works in ophthalmology. Traditional methods involve direct data transfer, whereas newer approaches prioritize security and privacy by sharing derived datasets, creating secure research environments, or using model-to-data strategies. We examine each method's mechanisms, variations, recent applications in ophthalmology, and their respective advantages and disadvantages. By empowering medical researchers with insights into data sharing methods and considerations, this review aims to assist informed decision-making while upholding ethical standards and patient privacy in medical AI development.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceInformation DisseminationOphthalmologyHumans

Identifiers

PMID38864811
PMCPMC11174091

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.