Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38865490›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2024

Recurrent Duplication and Diversification of a Vital DNA Repair Gene Family Across Drosophila.

Cara L Brand, Genevieve T Oliver, Isabella Z Farkas, Michael Buszczak, Mia T Levine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cross-species incompatibilities offer new insights into the functional consequences of satellite DNA evolution.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cara L BrandDepartment of Biology and Epigenetics Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3559-1790
Genevieve T OliverDepartment of Biology and Epigenetics Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-6823-5743
Isabella Z FarkasDepartment of Biology and Epigenetics Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-8486-6206
Michael BuszczakDepartment of Molecular Biology and Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6361-3654
Mia T LevineDepartment of Biology and Epigenetics Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4311-7535

Funding

Causes and functional consequences of chromatin evolutionR35GM124684 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Mia Tauna Levine · 2017 to 2026
$3.5M
Genetic Dissection of Germ Cell Differentiation and FunctionR35GM144043 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Michael Buszczak · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
Characterization of how mRNA translation influences reproductive agingR01AG079513 · NIA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Michael Buszczak · 2022 to 2026
$1.7M
Causes and consequences of intra-genomic coevolutionK99GM149943 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BRAND, CARA · 2023 to 2024
$248k
Life Sciences Research FoundationNIA NIH HHS R01 AG079513NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM149943NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124684NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM144043NIH HHS K99GM149943Shurl and Kay Curci Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintaining genome integrity is vital for organismal survival and reproduction. Essential, broadly conserved DNA repair pathways actively preserve genome integrity. However, many DNA repair proteins evolve adaptively. Ecological forces like UV exposure are classically cited drivers of DNA repair evolution. Intrinsic forces like repetitive DNA, which also imperil genome integrity, have received less attention. We recently reported that a Drosophila melanogaster-specific DNA satellite array triggered species-specific, adaptive evolution of a DNA repair protein called Spartan/MH. The Spartan family of proteases cleave hazardous, covalent crosslinks that form between DNA and proteins ("DNA-protein crosslink repair"). Appreciating that DNA satellites are both ubiquitous and universally fast-evolving, we hypothesized that satellite DNA turnover spurs adaptive evolution of DNA-protein crosslink repair beyond a single gene and beyond the D. melanogaster lineage. This hypothesis predicts pervasive Spartan gene family diversification across Drosophila species. To study the evolutionary history of the Drosophila Spartan gene family, we conducted population genetic, molecular evolution, phylogenomic, and tissue-specific expression analyses. We uncovered widespread signals of positive selection across multiple Spartan family genes and across multiple evolutionary timescales. We also detected recurrent Spartan family gene duplication, divergence, and gene loss. Finally, we found that ovary-enriched parent genes consistently birthed functionally diverged, testis-enriched daughter genes. To account for Spartan family diversification, we introduce a novel mechanistic model of antagonistic coevolution that links DNA satellite evolution and adaptive regulation of Spartan protease activity. This framework promises to accelerate our understanding of how DNA repeats drive recurrent evolutionary innovation to preserve genome integrity.

Indexed as

DNA RepairDrosophila ProteinsEvolution, MolecularGene DuplicationAnimalsDNA, SatelliteDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterMultigene FamilyPhylogenySelection, GeneticDNA, SatelliteDrosophila ProteinscoevolutionDNA–protein crosslink repairDrosophilasatellite DNASpartan

Identifiers

PMID38865490
PMCPMC11210505

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.