ReviewSchizophrenia research2024
Social network structure as a biopsychosocial suicide prevention target for young people at clinical high-risk for psychosis.
Review in Schizophrenia research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Life events and their subjective appraisal by children and adolescents in clinical high-risk states of psychosis: a cross-sectional comparison with inpatients with non-psychotic disorders and community subjects.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Suicidal Distress and Daily Well-Being: A New Model of Social Hysteresis.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Youth-Nominated Support Teams for Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (YST-CHR): A Novel Approach to Suicide Prevention in Early Psychosis.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Socio-Spatial Patterns of Suicide Mortality in the United States.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Interpersonal difficulties and suicidal ideation in young people at clinical high-risk for psychosis and help-seeking clinical controls.Psychiatry research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Young people who are at clinical high-risk for psychosis experience suicidal thoughts and behaviors at a greater rate than young people in the general population. However, no suicide prevention interventions have been specifically designed for or tested with this group of young people. To address this gap, we need to identify and leverage malleable potential intervention targets that can be measured at multiple levels of analysis. Here, we argue that social network structure, or the pattern of relationships in which a person is embedded, offers one potential target for intervention. We first provide a select review of what is currently known about social network structure and suicide risk, social network disruption among people at clinical high-risk for psychosis, and inflammatory processes as a potential underlying metric of social bond disruption. We then propose opportunities to advance suicide prevention research focused on young people at clinical high-risk for psychosis, with an eye toward establishing a foundation for future interventions that can account for biological, psychological, and social domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.