Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38866548›Full record

ArticleGenome research2024

GeneMark-ETP significantly improves the accuracy of automatic annotation of large eukaryotic genomes.

Tomáš Brůna, Alexandre Lomsadze, Mark Borodovsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome analysis of the glycosphingolipid-producing green alga tetraselmis sp. NKG400013.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evolution of compound eye cell types shapes visual behaviors acrossbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A Complete Telomere-To-Telomere Assembly ofEvolutionary applications · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tomáš Brůna *School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
Alexandre Lomsadze *Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0491-1648
Mark BorodovskySchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA; borodovsky@gatech.edu.

Funding

NIGMS Administrative Supplements to Support Undergraduate Summer ResearchR01GM128145 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BORODOVSKY, MARK · 2018 to 2021
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM128145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale genomic initiatives, such as the Earth BioGenome Project, require efficient methods for eukaryotic genome annotation. Here we present an automatic gene finder, GeneMark-ETP, integrating genomic-, transcriptomic-, and protein-derived evidence that has been developed with a focus on large plant and animal genomes. GeneMark-ETP first identifies genomic loci where extrinsic data are sufficient for making gene predictions with "high confidence." The genes situated in the genomic space between the high-confidence genes are predicted in the next stage. The set of high-confidence genes serves as an initial training set for the statistical model. Further on, the model parameters are iteratively updated in the rounds of gene prediction and parameter re-estimation. Upon reaching convergence, GeneMark-ETP makes the final predictions and delivers the whole complement of predicted genes. GeneMark-ETP outperforms gene finders using a single type of extrinsic evidence. Comparisons with gene finders MAKER2 and TSEBRA, those that use both transcript- and protein-derived extrinsic evidence, show that GeneMark-ETP delivers state-of-the-art gene-prediction accuracy, with the margin of outperforming existing approaches increasing in its application to larger and more complex eukaryotic genomes.

Indexed as

Molecular Sequence AnnotationAlgorithmsAnimalsEukaryotaGenomeGenomicsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID38866548
PMCPMC11216313

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.