ArticleScientific reports2024
Associations between circadian alignment and cognitive functioning in a nationally representative sample of older adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circadian rhythm sleep disorders and changes in cognitive function and sleepiness among healthcare workers.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
- Eveningness in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Associations With Sleep, Internalising Symptoms, and Alertness.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic determinants of shift work employment in Canada and the Netherlands: a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging and the Hoorn Study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Move to Remember: The Role of Physical Activity and Exercise in Preserving and Enhancing Cognitive Function in Aging-A Narrative Review.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Long sleep duration, cognitive performance, and the moderating role of depression: A cross-sectional analysis in the Framingham Heart Study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proper alignment of activity-rest and light-dark patterns allows for healthy bodily functions to occur at optimal times of the day. Disruptions to this alignment may cause poor sleep as well as physical, mental, and cognitive problems. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine if poorer circadian alignment was associated with decreased cognitive functioning among older (> 60 years) participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We utilized actigraphy-based rest-activity and dark-light measurements to calculate phasor magnitude (strength of circadian alignment coupling) and phasor angle (phase difference between activity-rest and light-dark cycles). Multiple linear regression models were used to determine associations of phasor magnitude and angle with performance in various cognitive tests, including Digit Symbol Substitution Test score (DSSS), CERAD Savings Percentage (CSP), and Animal Fluency Test (AFT) score. The results showed that a lower phasor magnitude (which indicates decreased strength of alignment coupling between rest-activity and dark-light cycles) was significantly associated with decreased DSSS (indicating slower processing speed and poorer working memory) when controlling for many important sociodemographic factors. However, this association became non-significant when accounting for sleep duration and total physical activity. Phasor angle did not have a significant association with any of the cognitive scores. Overall, we provided evidence indicating that circadian alignment may be a predictor of cognitive performance. Future studies should investigate whether improving circadian alignment may improve cognitive function and prevent cognitive decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.