Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38870186›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Double burden of malnutrition among women of reproductive age: Trends and determinants over the last 15 years in India.

Ivan James Prithishkumar, Marimuthu Sappani, Varsha Ranjan, Chhavi Garg, Thenmozhi Mani, Malavika Babu, Melvin Joy, Bhawna Rao, Edwin Sam Asirvatham, Jeyaseelan Lakshmanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Defining double burden of malnutrition across individual, household and population level: A narrative review.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ivan James PrithishkumarMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-1475-0561
Marimuthu SappaniDepartment of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Varsha RanjanIndependent Public Health Consultant, New Delhi, India.
Chhavi GargFaculty of Science, Global Health: Research, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Thenmozhi ManiDepartment of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3932-5625
Malavika BabuDepartment of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Melvin JoyBiostatistician, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9323-994X
Bhawna RaoNational AIDS Control Organization (NACO), New Delhi, India.
Edwin Sam AsirvathamHealth Systems Research India Initiative (HSRII), Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Jeyaseelan LakshmananMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-9090-3005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDouble burden of malnutrition (DBM) has been recognized by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as an emerging Global Syndemic characterized by the simultaneous occurrence of both undernutrition and overnutrition. Women of the reproductive age group (15 to 49 years) are disproportionately affected by DBM and are at high risk of continuing the intergenerational cycle of malnutrition. This study aims to assess the changing trends and determinants of DBM among women of the reproductive age group in India. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used data from three rounds of National Family Health Surveys (NFHS-3,4,5) conducted in years 2005-06, 2015-16, and 2019-2021. Descriptive statistics and Poisson regression analysis were done using weights with log link function.

resultsThe prevalence of anaemia, underweight and overweight/obesity was 57.2%, 18.6% and 24% respectively. The combined burden of underweight and anaemia has declined by 46% (21.6% to 11.7%), whereas the combined burden of overweight/obesity and anaemia has increased by 130% (5.4% to 12.4%) in the past 15 years. The prevalence of DBM, which includes both underweight and overweight/obesity with anaemia was 24.1% in 2021, a decline of 11% in 15 years. Women who were younger, rural, less educated, poor and middle class, and women living in the eastern, western and southern regions of India had higher risk for being underweight with anaemia and lower risk for developing overweight/obesity with anaemia.

conclusionThe significant decrease in underweight yet enormous increase in overweight/obesity over the past 15 years with the persistence of anaemia in both ends of the nutritional spectrum is characteristic of the new nutritional reality emphasizing the need to address malnutrition in all its forms. It is critical to consider geography and a population specific, double-duty targeted intervention to holistically address the risk factors associated with DBM and accomplish India's commitment to the global agenda of Sustainable Development Goals-2030.

Indexed as

AnemiaMalnutritionThinnessAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIndiaMiddle AgedObesityOverweightPrevalenceRisk FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38870186
PMCPMC11175463

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.