Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38872128›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

Primary care physicians' perceptions of artificial intelligence systems in the care of adolescents' mental health.

Pooria Ghadiri, Mark J Yaffe, Alayne Mary Adams, Samira Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Atencion primaria · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pooria GhadiriDepartment of Family Medicine and Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, 5858 Ch. de la Côte-des-Neiges, Montréal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0867-2907
Mark J YaffeDepartment of Family Medicine and Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, 5858 Ch. de la Côte-des-Neiges, Montréal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5488-1972
Alayne Mary AdamsDepartment of Family Medicine and Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, 5858 Ch. de la Côte-des-Neiges, Montréal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada.
Samira Abbasgholizadeh-RahimiDepartment of Family Medicine and Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, 5858 Ch. de la Côte-des-Neiges, Montréal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada. samira.rahimi@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-3781-1360

Funding

Jewish General Hospital Foundation and the Goldman-Herzl Family Practice Centre, Montreal Canada N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven that mental health problems in adolescence may have lifelong impacts, the role of primary care physicians (PCPs) in identifying and managing these issues is important. Artificial Intelligence (AI) may offer solutions to the current challenges involved in mental health care. We therefore explored PCPs' challenges in addressing adolescents' mental health, along with their attitudes towards using AI to assist them in their tasks.

methodsWe used purposeful sampling to recruit PCPs for a virtual Focus Group (FG). The virtual FG lasted 75 minutes and was moderated by two facilitators. A life transcription was produced by an online meeting software. Transcribed data was cleaned, followed by a priori and inductive coding and thematic analysis.

resultsWe reached out to 35 potential participants via email. Seven agreed to participate, and ultimately four took part in the FG. PCPs perceived that AI systems have the potential to be cost-effective, credible, and useful in collecting large amounts of patients' data, and relatively credible. They envisioned AI assisting with tasks such as diagnoses and establishing treatment plans. However, they feared that reliance on AI might result in a loss of clinical competency. PCPs wanted AI systems to be user-friendly, and they were willing to assist in achieving this goal if it was within their scope of practice and they were compensated for their contribution. They stressed a need for regulatory bodies to deal with medicolegal and ethical aspects of AI and clear guidelines to reduce or eliminate the potential of patient harm.

conclusionThis study provides the groundwork for assessing PCPs' perceptions of AI systems' features and characteristics, potential applications, possible negative aspects, and requirements for using them. A future study of adolescents' perspectives on integrating AI into mental healthcare might contribute a fuller understanding of the potential of AI for this population.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAttitude of Health PersonnelFocus GroupsPhysicians, Primary CareAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesAdolescent healthArtificial intelligenceFamily physiciansInnovative technologiesMental healthPediatriciansPrimary care physicians

Identifiers

PMID38872128
PMCPMC11170885

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.