Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38872180›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Unravelling the Belgian cascade of hypertension care and its determinants: insights from a cross-sectional analysis.

Philippe Bos, Edwin Wouters, Katrien Danhieux, Josefien van Olmen, Roy Remmen, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch, Daniel Boateng, Veerle Buffel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Philippe BosDepartment of Sociology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. Philippe.Bos@Uantwerpen.be.
Edwin WoutersDepartment of Sociology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Katrien DanhieuxDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Josefien van OlmenDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Roy RemmenDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Kerstin Klipstein-GrobuschJulius Global Health, Department of Global Health and Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Daniel BoatengJulius Global Health, Department of Global Health and Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Veerle BuffelDepartment of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G0B4721NHorizon 2020 Framework Programme 825432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality worldwide. Despite the widespread availability of effective antihypertensives, blood pressure (BP) control rates remain suboptimal, even in high-income countries such as Belgium. In this study, we used a cascade of care approach to identify where most patients are lost along the continuum of hypertension care in Belgium, and to assess the main risk factors for attrition at various stages of hypertension management.

methodsUsing cross-sectional data from the 2018 Belgian Health Interview Survey and the Belgian Health Examination Survey, we estimated hypertension prevalence among the Belgian population aged 40-79 years, and the proportion that was (1) screened, (2) diagnosed, (3) linked to care, (4) in treatment, (5) followed up and (6) well-controlled. Cox regression models were estimated to identify individual risk factors for being unlinked to hypertension care, untreated and not followed up appropriately.

resultsThe prevalence of hypertension based on self-reported and measured high BP was 43.3%. While 98% of the hypertensive population had their BP measured in the past 5 years, only 56.7% were diagnosed. Furthermore, 53.4% were linked to care, 49.8% were in treatment and 43.4% received adequate follow-up. Less than a quarter (23.5%) achieved BP control. Among those diagnosed with hypertension, males, those of younger age, without comorbidities, and smokers, were more likely to be unlinked to care. Once in care, younger age, lower BMI, financial hardship, and psychological distress were associated with a higher risk of being untreated. Finally, among those treated for hypertension, females, those of younger age, and without comorbidities were more likely to receive no adequate follow-up.

conclusionOur results show that undiagnosed hypertension is the most significant barrier to BP control in Belgium. Health interventions are thus needed to improve the accurate and timely diagnosis of hypertension. Once diagnosed, the Belgian health system retains patients fairly well along the continuum of hypertension care, yet targeted health interventions to improve hypertension management for high-risk groups remain necessary, especially with regard to improving treatment rates.

Indexed as

HypertensionAdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBelgiumContinuity of Patient CareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsAwarenessBlood pressureCascade of careControlHypertensionPrevalenceRisk factorsSocioeconomic determinantsTreatment

Identifiers

PMID38872180
PMCPMC11177511

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.