ReviewGenome biology2024
Legal aspects of privacy-enhancing technologies in genome-wide association studies and their impact on performance and feasibility.
Review in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anonymization, accountability, and access: legal dimensions of health data sharing in federated networks. Perspectives from empirical study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Analysis Methods for Diagnosing Rare Neurodevelopmental Diseases with Episignatures: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Pharmacomicrobiomics.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
- Should recipient parents have access to gamete donors' raw genomic data? Clinical, legal, and ethical considerations.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Epigenetic Alterations Induced by Smoking and Their Intersection with Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Review
- Genomics and Bioinformatics in One Health: Transdisciplinary Approaches for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Author Correction: Legal aspects of privacy-enhancing technologies in genome-wide association studies and their impact on performance and feasibility.Genome biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic data holds huge potential for medical progress but requires strict safety measures due to its sensitive nature to comply with data protection laws. This conflict is especially pronounced in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) which rely on vast amounts of genomic data to improve medical diagnoses. To ensure both their benefits and sufficient data security, we propose a federated approach in combination with privacy-enhancing technologies utilising the findings from a systematic review on federated learning and legal regulations in general and applying these to GWAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.