ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024
Enhancing bladder cancer diagnosis through transitional cell carcinoma polyp detection and segmentation: an artificial intelligence powered deep learning solution.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence advances in cystoscopy and imaging for bladder cancer: a narrative review.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Review
- Innovative AI model for bladder cancer diagnosis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Bladder lesion detection using EfficientNet and hybrid attention transformer through attention transformation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bladder cancer, specifically transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) polyps, presents a significant healthcare challenge worldwide. Accurate segmentation of TCC polyps in cystoscopy images is crucial for early diagnosis and urgent treatment. Deep learning models have shown promise in addressing this challenge. Methods: We evaluated deep learning architectures, including Unetplusplus_vgg19, Unet_vgg11, and FPN_resnet34, trained on a dataset of annotated cystoscopy images of low quality. Results: The models showed promise, with Unetplusplus_vgg19 and FPN_resnet34 exhibiting precision of 55.40 and 57.41%, respectively, suitable for clinical application without modifying existing treatment workflows. Conclusion: Deep learning models demonstrate potential in TCC polyp segmentation, even when trained on lower-quality images, suggesting their viability in improving timely bladder cancer diagnosis without impacting the current clinical processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.