Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38873399›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2024

A data extraction template for the behaviour change intervention ontology.

Emma Norris, Lisa Zhang, Kelsey Wuerstl, Hannah Froome, Susan Michie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma NorrisDepartment of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9957-4025
Lisa ZhangCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4255-9609
Kelsey WuerstlSchool of Health & Exercise Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Hannah FroomeDepartment of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, London, England, UK.
Susan MichieCentre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0063-6378

Funding

Wellcome Trust 201524/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology (BCIO) aims to improve the clarity, completeness and consistency of reporting within intervention descriptions and evidence synthesis. However, a recommended method for transparently annotating intervention evaluation reports using the BCIO does not currently exist. This study aimed to develop a data extraction template for annotating using the BCIO. Methods: The BCIO data extraction template was developed in four stages: i) scoping review of papers citing component ontologies within the BCIO, ii) development of a draft template, iii) piloting and revising the template, and iv) dissemination and maintenance of the template. Results: A prototype data extraction template using Microsoft Excel was developed based on BCIO annotations from 14 papers. The 'BCIO data extraction template v1' was produced following piloting and revision, incorporating a facility for user feedback. Discussion: This data extraction template provides a single, accessible resource to extract all necessary characteristics of behaviour change intervention scenarios. It can be used to annotate the presence of BCIO entities for evidence synthesis, including systematic reviews. In the future, we will update this template based on feedback from the community, additions of newly published ontologies within the BCIO, and revisions to existing ontologies.

Indexed as

annotationbehaviour change interventiondata extractionevidence synthesisintervention reportingontology

Identifiers

PMID38873399
PMCPMC11170071

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.