Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38874456›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2024

The interictal suppression hypothesis is the dominant differentiator of seizure onset zones in focal epilepsy.

Derek J Doss, Jared S Shless, Sarah K Bick, Ghassan S Makhoul, Aarushi S Negi, Camden E Bibro, Rohan Rashingkar, Abhijeet Gummadavelli, Catie Chang, Martin J Gallagher and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antiseizure Networks.Epilepsy currents · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Short-Term Modulation of Epileptic Network with Low-Frequency Thalamic Stimulation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Can brain network analyses guide epilepsy surgery?Current opinion in neurology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Derek J DossDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2685-0762
Jared S ShlessDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0702-4454
Sarah K BickDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0753-1720
Ghassan S MakhoulDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-9281-541X
Aarushi S NegiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4216-8317
Camden E BibroDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-6440-9245
Rohan RashingkarDepartment of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-8231-5782
Abhijeet GummadavelliDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0505-7511
Catie ChangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1541-9579
Martin J GallagherDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3537-4200
Robert P NaftelDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4344-503X
Shilpa B ReddyDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3172-0102
Shawniqua Williams RobersonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1331-380X
Victoria L MorganDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8263-2324
Graham W JohnsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9154-4315
Dario J EnglotDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8373-690X

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007347 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER S. · 1985 to 2023
$26.3M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Postdoctoral Training in Biomedical MRI and MRST32EB001628 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI John C Gore · 2003 to 2026
$7.0M
Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM152284 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher S. Williams · 2024 to 2026
$4.8M
Relating Vigilance to Connectivity and Neurocognition in Temporal Lobe EpilepsyR01NS112252 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ENGLOT, DARIO J · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
Training Program for Innovative Engineering Research in Surgery and InterventionT32EB021937 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Dario J Englot, Michael Ian Miga · 2016 to 2026
$2.3M
Development of multimodal network analyses to improve epilepsy surgery outcomesR01NS134625 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Dario J Englot · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
MULTIMODAL MAPPING OF SUBCORTICAL AND CORTICAL FUNCTIONAL NETWORK DISTURBANCES IN FOCAL EPILEPSYR00NS097618 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ENGLOT, DARIO J · 2017 to 2019
$743k
Dynamic multimodal connectivity analysis of brain networks in focal epilepsyF31NS131056 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DOSS, DEREK J · 2023 to 2024
$60k
Directed connectivity analysis of resting-state SEEG and DWI to improve lateralization and localization in focal epilepsyF31NS120401 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GRAHAM WALTER · 2021 to 2022
$52k
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001628NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB021937NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007347NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM152284NIH HHS T32-EB001628, T32-EB021937, T32-GM007347, F31-NS131056, R01-NS112252, F31-NS120401, R00NS097618NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS120401NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS131056NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS097618NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS112252NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS134625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful surgical treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy traditionally relies on the identification of seizure onset zones (SOZs). Connectome-based analyses of electrographic data from stereo electroencephalography (SEEG) may empower improved detection of SOZs. Specifically, connectome-based analyses based on the interictal suppression hypothesis posit that when the patient is not having a seizure, SOZs are inhibited by non-SOZs through high inward connectivity and low outward connectivity. However, it is not clear whether there are other motifs that can better identify potential SOZs. Thus, we sought to use unsupervised machine learning to identify network motifs that elucidate SOZs and investigate if there is another motif that outperforms the ISH. Resting-state SEEG data from 81 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing a pre-surgical evaluation at Vanderbilt University Medical Center were collected. Directed connectivity matrices were computed using the alpha band (8-13 Hz). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on each patient's connectivity matrix. Each patient's components were analysed qualitatively to identify common patterns across patients. A quantitative definition was then used to identify the component that most closely matched the observed pattern in each patient. A motif characteristic of the interictal suppression hypothesis (high-inward and low-outward connectivity) was present in all individuals and found to be the most robust motif for identification of SOZs in 64/81 (79%) patients. This principal component demonstrated significant differences in SOZs compared to non-SOZs. While other motifs for identifying SOZs were present in other patients, they differed for each patient, suggesting that seizure networks are patient specific, but the ISH is present in nearly all networks. We discovered that a potentially suppressive motif based on the interictal suppression hypothesis was present in all patients, and it was the most robust motif for SOZs in 79% of patients. Each patient had additional motifs that further characterized SOZs, but these motifs were not common across all patients. This work has the potential to augment clinical identification of SOZs to improve epilepsy treatment.

Indexed as

ConnectomeDrug Resistant EpilepsyElectroencephalographyEpilepsies, PartialSeizuresAdolescentAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnsupervised Machine LearningYoung Adultconnectomicsdrug-resistant focal epilepsyinterictal suppression hypothesismachine learningprincipal component analysisstereo electroencephalography

Identifiers

PMID38874456
PMCPMC11370787

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.