Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38875678›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2024

Privacy-Preserving Federated Survival Support Vector Machines for Cross-Institutional Time-To-Event Analysis: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Julian Späth, Zeno Sewald, Niklas Probul, Magali Berland, Mathieu Almeida, Nicolas Pons, Emmanuelle Le Chatelier, Pere Ginès, Cristina Solé, Adrià Juanola and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Julian SpäthInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4562-5816
Zeno SewaldLipiTUM, Chair of Experimental Bioinformatics, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9890-7967
Niklas ProbulInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5793-0626
Magali BerlandMetaGenoPolis, INRAE, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6762-5350
Mathieu AlmeidaMetaGenoPolis, INRAE, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4971-0049
Nicolas PonsMetaGenoPolis, INRAE, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1926-8077
Emmanuelle Le ChatelierMetaGenoPolis, INRAE, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2724-0536
Pere GinèsLiver Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4657-4504
Cristina SoléLiver Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6104-8345
Adrià JuanolaLiver Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4832-5130
Josch PaulingLipiTUM, Chair of Experimental Bioinformatics, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9565-1903
Jan BaumbachInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0282-0462

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCentral collection of distributed medical patient data is problematic due to strict privacy regulations. Especially in clinical environments, such as clinical time-to-event studies, large sample sizes are critical but usually not available at a single institution. It has been shown recently that federated learning, combined with privacy-enhancing technologies, is an excellent and privacy-preserving alternative to data sharing.

objectiveThis study aims to develop and validate a privacy-preserving, federated survival support vector machine (SVM) and make it accessible for researchers to perform cross-institutional time-to-event analyses.

methodsWe extended the survival SVM algorithm to be applicable in federated environments. We further implemented it as a FeatureCloud app, enabling it to run in the federated infrastructure provided by the FeatureCloud platform. Finally, we evaluated our algorithm on 3 benchmark data sets, a large sample size synthetic data set, and a real-world microbiome data set and compared the results to the corresponding central method.

resultsOur federated survival SVM produces highly similar results to the centralized model on all data sets. The maximal difference between the model weights of the central model and the federated model was only 0.001, and the mean difference over all data sets was 0.0002. We further show that by including more data in the analysis through federated learning, predictions are more accurate even in the presence of site-dependent batch effects.

conclusionsThe federated survival SVM extends the palette of federated time-to-event analysis methods by a robust machine learning approach. To our knowledge, the implemented FeatureCloud app is the first publicly available implementation of a federated survival SVM, is freely accessible for all kinds of researchers, and can be directly used within the FeatureCloud platform.

Indexed as

algorithmcentralized modelFeatureCloudfederatedfederated learningImplementationImplementation sciencemachine learningpredictpredictionpredictionspredictiveprivacy regulationsupport vector machinesurvivalsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID38875678
PMCPMC11041494

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.