ArticleScientific reports2024
Screening of co-expressed genes in hypopharyngeal carcinoma with esophageal carcinoma based on RNA sequencing and Clinical Research.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic atlas of premalignant oral squamous cell carcinoma in an aging mouse model reveals an enhanced immune response and dysregulation of head and neck tissue stem cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial DNA methylation predicts immunotherapy response and prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma: evidence from scRNA-Seq and machine learning.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- CNTNAP2: isoform- and context-specific functions in neurological disorders and cancer.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
- The Functional Interplay among GAD2, GABRG2, and CACNA1G Genes in Cancers.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To explore the hub comorbidity genes and potential pathogenic mechanisms of hypopharyngeal carcinoma with esophageal carcinoma, and evaluate their diagnostic value for hypopharyngeal carcinoma with co-morbid esophageal carcinoma. We performed gene sequencing on tumor tissues from 6 patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (hereafter referred to as "group A") and 6 patients with pure hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (hereafter referred to as "group B"). We analyzed the mechanism of hub genes in the development and progression of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through bioinformatics, and constructed an ROC curve and Nomogram prediction model to analyze the value of hub genes in clinical diagnosis and treatment. 44,876 genes were sequenced in 6 patients with group A and 6 patients with group B. Among them, 76 genes showed significant statistical differences between the group A and the group B.47 genes were expressed lower in the group A than in the group B, and 29 genes were expressed higher. The top five hub genes were GABRG2, CACNA1A, CNTNAP2, NOS1, and SCN4B. GABRG2, CNTNAP2, and SCN4B in the hub genes have high diagnostic value in determining whether hypopharyngeal carcinoma patients have combined esophageal carcinoma (AUC: 0.944, 0.944, 0.972). These genes could possibly be used as potential molecular markers for assessing the risk of co-morbidity of hypopharyngeal carcinoma combined with esophageal carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.