Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38878996›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2024

The Work-life Check-ins randomized controlled trial: A leader-based adaptive, semi-structured burnout intervention in primary care clinics.

David A Hurtado, Jacqueline Boyd, Rachel Madjlesi, Samuel A Greenspan, David Ezekiel-Herrera, Gideon Potgieter, Leslie B Hammer, Teresa Everson, Abigail Lenhart

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05436548 (The Work-life Check-ins), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05436548 narecruitingnot on this map

The Work-life Check-ins: a Supervisor-driven Intervention to Reduce Burnout in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorOregon Health and Science UniversityRan2023 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsBurnoutArmsSupervisor-employee frequent check-ins to identify and address work stressors, Usual practice waitlist controls
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David A HurtadoOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, United States of America; OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, United States of America. Electronic address: hurtadod@ohsu.edu.
Jacqueline BoydOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, United States of America.
Rachel MadjlesiOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, United States of America.
Samuel A GreenspanOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, United States of America.
David Ezekiel-HerreraDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, United States of America.
Gideon PotgieterOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, United States of America.
Leslie B HammerOregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, United States of America.
Teresa EversonMultnomah County Health Department, United States of America.
Abigail LenhartDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, United States of America.

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS U19 OH010154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBurnout in primary care undermines worker well-being and patient care. Many factors contribute to burnout, including high workloads, emotional stress, and unsupportive supervisors. Formative evidence suggests that burnout might be reduced if clinic leaders hold quarterly and brief (∼30 min) one-on-one check-ins with team members to acknowledge and address work-life stressors (e.g., schedules, workflow breakdowns, time off requests). This paper describes the intervention protocol for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to evaluate the effectiveness and process of the check-ins in reducing burnout among primary care professionals.

methodsTwo-arm RCT conducted at 12 primary care clinics of a healthcare system in the Pacific Northwest. Six clinics received an adaptive design, semi-structured intervention, including predefined training modules with evidence-based tactics to reduce burnout through the check-ins, followed by clinic-specific feedback sessions prior to offering and conducting quarterly leader-employee check-ins. Six clinics were randomized as waitlist controls. Burnout was measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include organizational constraints, psychological safety, and supervisor support. Multilevel modeling and qualitative methods were applied to evaluate the effects and process of the intervention.

conclusionBy focusing on modifiable work-life factors such as stressors and supervisor support, the check-ins intervention aims to reduce burnout rates among primary care professionals. Findings from this trial will shed light on the conditions upon which check-ins might reduce burnout. Results will also inform policies and interventions aimed at improving mental health and well-being in primary care settings. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: ID NCT05436548.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalLeadershipPrimary Health CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWorkloadOccupational burnoutPrimary carePsychosocial interventionTrial protocol

Identifiers

PMID38878996
PMCPMC12087975

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.