Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38880803›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2025

Osteosarcopenia: the coexistence of sarcopenia and osteopenia is predictive of prognosis and postoperative complications after curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Takaaki Fujimoto, Koji Tamura, Kinuko Nagayoshi, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Yoshio Oh, Tsukasa Nara, Hiroshi Matsumoto, Kohei Horioka, Koji Shindo, Kohei Nakata and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Takaaki FujimotoDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. fujimoto.takaaki.853@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Koji TamuraDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Kinuko NagayoshiDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Yusuke MizuuchiDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Yoshio OhDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Tsukasa NaraDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Hiroshi MatsumotoDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Kohei HoriokaDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Koji ShindoDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Kohei NakataDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Kenoki OhuchidaDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Masafumi NakamuraDepartment of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo establish if osteosarcopenia is related to postoperative complications, prognosis, and recurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) after curative surgery.

methodsThe clinical data of 594 patients who underwent curative resection for CRC between January, 2013 and December, 2018 were analyzed retrospectively to examine the relationship between clinicopathological data and osteosarcopenia. The following definitions were used: sarcopenia, low skeletal muscle mass index; osteopenia, low bone mineral density on computed tomography at the level of the 11th thoracic vertebra; and osteosarcopenia, sarcopenia with osteopenia.

resultsOsteosarcopenia was identified in 98 patients (16.5%) and found to be a significant risk factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio 2.53; p = 0.011). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of the patients with osteosarcopenia were significantly lower than those of the patients without osteosarcopenia (OS: 72.5% and 93.9%, respectively, p < 0.0001; RFS: 70.8% and 92.4%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified osteosarcopenia as an independent prognostic factor associated with OS (hazard ratio 3.31; p < 0.0001) and RFS (hazard ratio 3.67; p < 0.0001).

conclusionOsteosarcopenia may serve as a predictor of postoperative complications and prognosis after curative surgery for CRC.

Indexed as

Bone Diseases, MetabolicColorectal NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsSarcopeniaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival RateColorectal cancerOsteopeniaOsteosarcopeniaPrognosisSarcopenia

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.