Evidence mapPaperPMID 38880821Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2024

Cost-effectiveness of Finerenone in Addition to Standard of Care for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes in China.

Jian Ming, Guanqi Hong, Yingrui Xu, Paul Mernagh, Michał Pochopień, Hongchao Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Care of Adults with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jian Ming *Real World Solutions, IQVIA China, Shanghai, China.
Guanqi Hong *Real World Solutions, IQVIA China, Shanghai, China.
Yingrui XuMedical Affairs, Pharmaceuticals, Bayer Healthcare Company Ltd, Beijing, China.
Paul MernaghBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Michał PochopieńAssignity, Krakow, Poland.
Hongchao LiSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business, Centre for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China. lihongchao@cpu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdding finerenone to current standard of care (SoC), as recommended by Chinese guidelines, has shown substantial benefit in delaying chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the landmark FIDELIO-DKD trial. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of finerenone + SoC versus SoC alone among Chinese patients with T2D and CKD from a healthcare system perspective.

methodsA cost-effectiveness model (FINE-CKD) has been developed and published, with health states defined for CKD stages (CKD 1/2, CKD 3, CKD 4, and CKD 5 without renal replacement therapy (RRT), dialysis, or transplant) and cardiovascular event history. Additionally, the model also considered adverse events. Transition probabilities and event risks were derived using patient-level data from Asian population analysis of FIDELIO-DKD. Since the price of finerenone after the national reimbursement drug list (NRDL) inclusion was confidential, the cost of finerenone in the model was assumed to be the same as that of SoC. Other health resource costs were gathered from literature and supplemented by physician interviews. Measured by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, quality of life was translated into utilities based on the Chinese EQ-5D-5L value set.

resultsDiscounted at 5.0% annually, over a lifetime horizon, finerenone + SoC resulted in a quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gain of 0.321 versus SoC alone (8.660 vs. 8.338 QALYs), due to a reduction in the incidence of cardiovascular events and dialysis. Total costs per patient were lower under finerenone + SoC than SoC alone (381,130 CNY vs. 392,390 CNY). As a result, finerenone + SoC was a dominant treatment strategy compared with SoC alone. Sensitivity analysis has confirmed the robustness of this study.

conclusionAdding finerenone to SoC was likely to be either a dominant or cost-effective treatment option compared with SoC alone in Chinese patients with CKD and T2D.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2NaphthyridinesRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsStandard of CarefinerenoneMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsNaphthyridinesChronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetesDiabetic kidney diseaseDiabetic nephropathyFinerenone

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.