SynthesisGlobal heart2024
Community-Based Strategies to Improve Health-Related Outcomes in People Living With Hypertension in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Global heart, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Associations between social determinants and poor hypertension treatment adherence among middle-aged and older people in rural China: a hospital-based case‒control study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Application of the ADAPT Framework to Contextualize a Participatory Learning and Action Community Intervention for the Prevention and Control of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Urban and Rural Settings in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Protocol for Intervention Adaptation.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Prehypertension and hypertension among older adults: prevalence, awareness, treatment, control and associated factors - findings from Iranian STEPS survey (2016 and 2021).Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026Article
- Female Community Health Volunteer-led intervention for hypertension prevention and control in rural Nepal: A hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation design.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Hypertension Control in Bangladesh: Changes, Sociodemographic Variation, and Socioeconomic Inequality from the 2017-18 to 2022 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys.Global heart · 2026Article
- Oral Immediate-Release Nifedipine Versus Intravenous Hydralazine for Controlling Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy: A Double-Blind Randomised Controlled Trial.International journal of medical science and dental health · 2026Article
- Factors associated with medication adherence among hypertensive patients in Namibia.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2026Article
- Prevalence and risk factors of hypertension in rural Bangladesh: A population-based cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Hypertension control in resource-constrained settings: Bridging socioeconomic gaps with predictive insights.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025Article
- Comparative effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for prehypertension: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Individuals living with hypertension are at an increased risk of cardiovascular- and cerebrovascular-related outcomes. Interventions implemented at the community level to improve hypertension control are considered useful to prevent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; however, systematic evaluation of such community level interventions among patients living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is scarce. Methods: Nine databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster randomized control trials (cRCTs) implementing community level interventions in adults with hypertension in LMICs. Studies were included based on explicit focus on blood pressure control. Quality assessment was done using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials (ROBS 2). Results were presented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Fixed-effect meta-analyses were conducted for studies that reported continuous outcome measures. Results: We identified and screened 7125 articles. Eighteen studies, 7 RCTs and 11 cRCTs were included in the analysis. The overall summary effect of blood pressure control was significant, risk ratio = 1.48 (95%CI = 1.40-1.57, n = 12). Risk ratio for RCTs was 1.68 (95%CI = 1.40-2.01, n = 5), for cRCTs risk ratio = 1.46 (95%CI = 1.32-1.61, n = 7). For studies that reported individual data for the multicomponent interventions, the risk ratio was 1.27 (95% CI = 1.04-1.54, n = 3). Discussion: Community-based strategies are relevant in addressing the burden of hypertension in LMICs. Community-based interventions can help decentralize hypertension care in LMIC and address the access to care gap without diminishing the quality of hypertension control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.