Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38885482›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2024

Safety and feasibility of third-party cytotoxic T lymphocytes for high-risk patients with COVID-19.

Dolores Grosso, John L Wagner, Allyson O'Connor, Kaitlyn Keck, Yanping Huang, Zi-Xuan Wang, Hilary Mehler, Benjamin Leiby, Phyllis Flomenberg, Usama Gergis and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04765449 (Third-Party COVID-19-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes for the Treatment of Elderly and High-Risk Patients With COVID-19 Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04765449 phase1completednot on this map

Third-Party COVID-19-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes for the Treatment of Elderly and High-Risk Patients With COVID-19 Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorThomas Jefferson UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsCovid19ArmsCytotoxic T Lymphocytes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Dolores GrossoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-1634-4663
John L WagnerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-8468-6764
Allyson O'ConnorDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Kaitlyn KeckDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Yanping HuangDepartment of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Zi-Xuan WangDepartments of Surgery and Pathology, Molecular and Genomic Pathology Laboratory, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Hilary MehlerDepartment of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Benjamin LeibyDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-0761-8383
Phyllis FlomenbergDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Usama GergisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-0656-7385
Neda NikbakhtDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Cutaneous Lymphoma Clinic, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-9587-8689
Michael MorrisDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Washington Township Hospital, Sewell, NJ.
Julie KarpDepartment of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-5970-4585
Alexis PeedinDepartment of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-3779-8602
Neal FlomenbergDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-3088-4615

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractCytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) destroy virally infected cells and are critical for the elimination of viral infections such as those caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Delayed and dysfunctional adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 are associated with poor outcomes. Treatment with allogeneic SARS-CoV-2-specific CTLs may enhance cellular immunity in high-risk patients providing a safe, direct mechanism of treatment. Thirty high-risk ambulatory patients with COVID-19 were enrolled in a phase 1 trial assessing the safety of third party, SARS-CoV-2-specific CTLs. Twelve interventional patients, 6 of whom were immunocompromised, matched the HLA-A∗02:01 restriction of the CTLs and received a single infusion of 1 of 4 escalating doses of a product containing 68.5% SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ CTLs/total cells. Symptom improvement and resolution in these patients was compared with an observational group of 18 patients lacking HLA-A∗02:01 who could receive standard of care. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed at any dosing level. Nasal swab polymerase chain reaction testing showed ≥88% and >99% viral elimination from baseline in all patients at 4 and 14 days after infusion, respectively. The CTLs did not interfere with the development of endogenous anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral or cellular responses. T-cell receptor β analysis showed persistence of donor-derived SARS-CoV-2-specific CTLs through the end of the 6-month follow-up period. Interventional patients consistently reported symptomatic improvement 2 to 3 days after infusion, whereas improvement was more variable in observational patients. SARS-CoV-2-specific CTLs are a potentially feasible cellular therapy for COVID-19 illness. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04765449.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2T-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHLA-A2 AntigenHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeHLA-A2 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID38885482
PMCPMC11345373

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.