ReviewActa neurochirurgica2024
Variability patterns in dual antiplatelet therapy following endovascular repair of intracranial aneurysms: Insight into regimen heterogeneity and the need for a consensus.
Review in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Endovascular management of internal carotid artery terminus aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Associations of new intracranial haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke and survival with dual antiplatelet therapy regimen or duration after endovascular treatment for ruptured cerebral aneurysm.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of p48 flow diverters in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.Neuroradiology · 2025Review
- Intracranial hemorrhagic events associated with flow diversion treatment: a retrospective analysis from a single academic institution.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This comprehensive review delves into the evolving field of neurointervention for intracranial aneurysms, exploring the critical adjunct of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) to endovascular coiling, stent-assisted coiling (SAC), flow-diversion stents, and flow-disruption (intrasaccular) devices. Despite growing evidence supporting the success of DAPT in reducing thromboembolic events, the lack of consensus on optimal regimens, doses, and duration is evident. Factors contributing to this variability include genetic polymorphisms affecting treatment response and ongoing debates regarding the clinical significance of hemorrhagic complications associated with DAPT. This review analyzes pre- and post-procedural antiplatelet usage across various interventions. The imperative lies in ongoing research to define optimal DAPT durations, ensuring a nuanced approach to the delicate balance between thrombosis and hemorrhage in intracranial aneurysm management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38888678What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.