Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38890244›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025

Specific microbiome patterns and their association with breast cancer: the intestinal microbiota as a potential biomarker and therapeutic strategy.

Alba Amaro-da-Cruz, Teresa Rubio-Tomás, Ana I Álvarez-Mercado

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Genomic and Biologic Landscapes of Breast Cancer and Racial Differences.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Interactions between the tumor microbiota and breast cancer.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alba Amaro-da-CruzDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Teresa Rubio-TomásInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Ana I Álvarez-MercadoInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada, 18014, Granada, Spain. alvarezmercado@ugr.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8476-9970

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most diagnosed cancers in women. Based on histological characteristics, they are classified as non-invasive, or in situ (tumors located within the milk ducts or milk lobules) and invasive. BC may develop from in situ carcinomas over time. Determining prognosis and predicting response to treatment are essential tools to manage this disease and reduce its incidence and mortality, as well as to promote personalized therapy for patients. However, over half of the cases are not associated with known risk factors. In addition, some patients develop resistance to treatment and relapse. Therefore, it is necessary to identify new biomarkers and treatment strategies that improve existing therapies. In this regard, the role of the microbiome is being researched as it could play a role in carcinogenesis and the efficacy of BC therapies. This review aims to describe specific microbiome patterns associated with BC. For this, a literature search was carried out in PubMed database using the MeSH terms "Breast Neoplasms" and "Gastrointestinal Microbiome", including 29 publications. Most of the studies have focused on characterizing the gut or breast tissue microbiome of the patients. Likewise, studies in animal models and in vitro that investigated the impact of gut microbiota (GM) on BC treatments and the effects of the microbiome on tumor cells were included. Based on the results of the included articles, BC could be associated with an imbalance in the GM. This imbalance varied depending on molecular type, stage and grade of cancer, menopause, menarche, body mass index, and physical activity. However, a specific microbial profile could not be identified as a biomarker. On the other hand, some studies suggest that the GM may influence the efficacy of BC therapies. In addition, some microorganisms and bacterial metabolites could improve the effects of therapies or influence tumor development.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsFemaleHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersBreast cancerChemotherapyMicrobiomeMicrobiotaTherapy

Identifiers

PMID38890244
PMCPMC11735593

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.