ArticleIrish journal of medical science2024
Relationship between maximum carotid plaque area and prognosis of patients with acute ischaemic stroke.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn this study, the relationship between maximum carotid plaque area and stroke prognosis was analysed by carotid ultrasonography, and the relevant risk factors affecting the prognosis of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) were investigated to provide novel insights into stroke prevention and management.
methodsA total of 205 AIS patients with carotid plaques were included in this study. Based on the mRS score at discharge, patients with AIS were classified into the good prognosis group (mRS ≤ 2) and poor prognosis group (mRS ≥ 3). SPSS 25.0 was used to analyse the data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the two groups with good and poor prognosis. Comparison between good and poor prognosis in patients with AIS in different circulatory systems was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
resultsComparison of baseline data revealed differences in carotid plaque diameter, carotid intima-media thickness, maximum carotid plaque area, history of previous stroke and plaque echogenicity between the good and poor prognosis groups (P < 0.05). Results of multifactorial analyses of logistic binary regression indicated that history of previous stroke and maximum carotid plaque area were predictors of poor prognosis, with odds ratio of 2.515 (95%CI [1.327-4.764]) and 1.019 (95%CI [1.006-1.032]), respectively.
conclusionThe maximum carotid plaque area and history of previous stroke are important predictors for assessing prognosis in patients with AIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38890259What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.