Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38890641›Full record

Trial reportBMC women's health2024

Efficacy and safety of eliapixant in endometriosis-associated pelvic pain: the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2b SCHUMANN study.

Susanne Parke, Kerstin Gude, Katrin Roth, Fabrizio Messina

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04614246 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Open for Active Comparator, Parallel-group, Multicenter Phase 2b Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Three Different Doses of P2X3 Antagonist), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04614246 phase2terminatednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Open for Active Comparator, Parallel-group, Multicenter Phase 2b Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Three Different Doses of P2X3 Antagonist (BAY1817080) Versus Placebo and Elagolix 150 mg in Women With Symptomatic Endometriosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorBayerRan2021 to 2022Enrolled215ConditionsEndometriosisArmsBAY1817080, Elagolix, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susanne ParkeResearch and Development, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany. susanne.parke@bayer.com.
Kerstin GudePharmacovigilance, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Katrin RothResearch and Development, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Fabrizio MessinaData Science UK, Bayer PLC, UK.

Funding

Bayer AG N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SCHUMANN study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the selective P2 × 3 antagonist eliapixant in patients with endometriosis-associated pelvic pain (EAPP).

methodsSCHUMANN was a randomized, placebo- and active comparator-controlled, double-blind to placebo and open-label to comparator, parallel-group, multicenter, dose-finding phase 2b study. The participants were women with surgically diagnosed endometriosis who fulfilled defined EAPP criteria. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to twice daily (BID) 25 mg, 75 mg, or 150 mg oral eliapixant or a placebo for 12 weeks. An exploratory once-daily elagolix 150 mg treatment group was also included. The primary endpoint was the absolute change in mean worst EAPP from baseline to the end of intervention (EOI).

resultsOverall, 215 participants were randomized for treatment (44 to eliapixant 25 mg, 44 to eliapixant 75 mg, 43 to eliapixant 150 mg, 43 to a placebo, and 41 to elagolix 150 mg). For safety reasons, the study was terminated early; both treatment and enrollment stopped immediately, producing less than 50% of the planned number of completers. The study found no significant differences in EAPP reduction from baseline between groups and no significant dose-response model. The elagolix 150 mg group showed better pain reduction than any of the other groups. No new safety signals were observed, relative to the previously known safety profile of eliapixant, which was generally well tolerated. However, one case of moderate and probably drug-induced liver injury in a participant receiving eliapixant 150 mg BID supported the association between eliapixant and a potential increase in liver function values, defined before the start of the phase 2 program.

conclusionsThis study did not meet its primary objective as no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences in changes of mean worst EAPP from baseline were observed between treatment groups. The single observed case of moderate, probably drug-induced liver injury was the second case in the eliapixant phase 2 program conducted in the following indications: refractory or unexplained chronic cough, diabetic neuropathic pain, overactive bladder, and EAPP. Due to this, the benefit-risk ratio for the study was no longer considered to be positive. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04614246; registered November 3, 2020.

Indexed as

EndometriosisPelvic PainAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHydrocarbons, FluorinatedMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPyrimidinesTreatment OutcomeelagolixHydrocarbons, FluorinatedPyrimidinesEliapixantEndometriosis-associated pelvic painP2X3 receptor antagonistPhase 2b clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID38890641
PMCPMC11186168

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.