Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38890699›Full record

SynthesisRespiratory research2024

Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes and/or respiratory muscle training in patients with post-COVID conditions: a systematic review.

Lucía Ortiz-Ortigosa, Paula Gálvez-Álvarez, María Jesús Viñolo-Gil, Manuel Rodriguez-Huguet, Jorge Góngora-Rodríguez, Rocío Martín-Valero

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucía Ortiz-OrtigosaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, University of Malaga, Málaga, 29071, Spain.
Paula Gálvez-ÁlvarezDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, University of Malaga, Málaga, 29071, Spain.
María Jesús Viñolo-GilDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, Cádiz, Spain.
Manuel Rodriguez-HuguetDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, Cádiz, Spain.
Jorge Góngora-RodríguezDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, Cádiz, Spain.
Rocío Martín-ValeroDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, University of Malaga, Málaga, 29071, Spain. rovalemas@uma.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe term "post-COVID-19 condition" refers to the symptomatology that appears between four to twelve weeks after Covid-19 infection. These symptoms can persist for weeks or even months, significantly diminishing the quality of life for affected individuals. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation programs and/or respiratory muscle training on respiratory sequelae in patients with post-COVID condition.

methodsThe literature search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, PEDro, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science. Randomized clinical trials were included in which participants were aged 18 years or older. Articles were excluded if at least one of the therapies did not involve pulmonary rehabilitation or respiratory muscle training, if the participants were COVID positive, if studies lacked results, and finally, if interventions were conducted without supervision or at home. This review only encompasses supervised non-virtual interventions. This study adheres to the PRISMA statement and has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023433843).

resultsThe outcomes obtained in the included studies are assessed across the following variables: Exercise capacity using the 6-minute walk test, Dyspnea, fatigue, Pulmonary function, Maximum inspiratory pressure, and Quality of life.

conclusionDespite the absence of a specific treatment at present, it was evident from this review that a well-structured pulmonary rehabilitation program that incorporates both aerobic and muscular strength exercises along with techniques and inspiratory muscle exercises was the most effective form of treatment.

Indexed as

Breathing ExercisesCOVID-19Exercise ToleranceHumansPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory MusclesTreatment Outcomepost-COVID-19 conditionPulmonary rehabilitation programRespiratory muscle trainingSequelae

Identifiers

PMID38890699
PMCPMC11186160

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.