Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38890752›Full record

GuidelineAdvances in rheumatology (London, England)2024

II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment.

Edgard Torres Dos Reis-Neto, Luciana Parente Costa Seguro, Emília Inoue Sato, Eduardo Ferreira Borba, Evandro Mendes Klumb, Lilian Tereza Lavras Costallat, Marta Maria das Chagas Medeiros, Eloisa Bonfá, Nafice Costa Araújo, Simone Appenzeller and 11 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readPractice GuidelineConsensus StatementSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Guideline in Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Lupus Nephritis from Pathogenesis to New Therapies: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Edgard Torres Dos Reis-Neto *Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPM/Unifesp), Otonis Street, 863, 2 Floor, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04025-002, Brazil. edgard.torres@unifesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0657-4825
Luciana Parente Costa Seguro *Division of Rheumatology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0538-9476
Emília Inoue SatoDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPM/Unifesp), Otonis Street, 863, 2 Floor, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04025-002, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8540-014X
Eduardo Ferreira BorbaDivision of Rheumatology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6194-5129
Evandro Mendes KlumbDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9546-3144
Lilian Tereza Lavras CostallatDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Traumatology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3077-9479
Marta Maria das Chagas MedeirosDivision of Rheumatology, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0389-8421
Eloisa BonfáDivision of Rheumatology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0520-4681
Nafice Costa AraújoDivision of Rheumatology, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo - Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9994-7311
Simone AppenzellerDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Traumatology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5075-4474
Ana Carolina de Oliveira E Silva MontandonDivision of Rheumatology, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5669-2542
Emily Figueiredo Neves YukiDivision of Rheumatology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8801-405X
Roberto Cordeiro de Andrade TeixeiraDivision of Rheumatology, Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4824-0543
Rosa Weiss TellesDivision of Rheumatology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4027-2943
Danielle Christinne Soares do EgyptoDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8236-024X
Francinne Machado RibeiroDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0038-983X
Andrese Aline GasparinDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7786-9562
Antonio Silaide de Araujo JuniorDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPM/Unifesp), Otonis Street, 863, 2 Floor, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04025-002, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9352-9477
Cláudia Lopes Santoro NeivaDivision of Rheumatology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7964-990X
Debora Cerqueira CalderaroDivision of Rheumatology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5535-3223
Odirlei Andre MonticieloDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0720-2097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN).

methodsTwo methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion.

resultsAll SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy.

conclusionThis consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.

Indexed as

Immunosuppressive AgentsLupus NephritisSocieties, MedicalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAzathioprineBiopsyBrazilCreatinineCyclophosphamideCyclosporineDisease ProgressionEvidence-Based MedicineGlucocorticoidsHumansHydroxychloroquineKidney Failure, ChronicAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAzathioprinebelimumabCreatinineCyclophosphamideCyclosporineGlucocorticoidsHydroxychloroquineImmunosuppressive AgentsLeflunomideMycophenolic AcidRituximab

Identifiers

PMID38890752
PMCPMC13488729

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.