Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38891197›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Chatting: Family Carers' Perspectives on Receiving Support from Dementia Crisis Teams.

Marcus Redley, Fiona Poland, Juanita Hoe, Tom Dening, Miriam Stanyon, Jen Yates, Amy Streater, Dons Coleston-Shields, Martin Orrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marcus RedleyDepartment of Psychology, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge CB11PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8866-7990
Fiona PolandSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0003-6911
Juanita HoeSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of West London, London W5 5RF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4647-8950
Tom DeningInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3387-4241
Miriam StanyonInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4326-0286
Jen YatesInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9451-1175
Amy StreaterResearch and Development, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, Ilford IG2 7SR, UK.
Dons Coleston-ShieldsInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6381-8518
Martin OrrellInstitute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1169-3530

Funding

National Institute for Health Research RP-PG-0612-20004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family caregivers are vital to enabling people with dementia to live longer in their own homes. For these caregivers, chatting with clinicians-being listened to empathetically and receiving reassurance-can be seen as not incidental but important to supporting them. This paper considers and identifies the significance of this relational work for family carers by re-examining data originally collected to document caregivers' perspectives on quality in crisis response teams. This reveals that chatting, for family caregivers, comprises three related features: (i) that family caregivers by responding to a person's changing and sometimes challenging needs and behaviors inhabit a precarious equilibrium; (ii) that caregivers greatly appreciate 'chatting' with visiting clinicians; and (iii) that while caregivers appreciate these chats, they can be highly critical of the institutionalized character of a crisis response team's involvement with them.

Indexed as

carer experiencescommunity caredementiafamily carersqualitative interviews

Identifiers

PMID38891197
PMCPMC11171500

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.