Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38891748›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Effects of Sweet and Forge Sorghum Silages Compared to Maize Silage without Additional Grain Supplement on Lactation Performance and Digestibility of Lactating Dairy Cows.

Sujiang Zhang, Jiao Wang, Shunping Lu, Abdul Shakoor Chaudhry, Divine Tarla, Hassan Khanaki, Imtiaz Hussain Raja, Anshan Shan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sujiang ZhangKey Laboratory of Tarim Animal Husbandry Science and Technology, College of Animal Science and Technology, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4022-225X
Jiao WangCollege of Life Sciences and Technology, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9317-9649
Shunping LuKey Laboratory of Tarim Animal Husbandry Science and Technology, College of Animal Science and Technology, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China.
Abdul Shakoor ChaudhrySchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6350-0374
Divine TarlaSchool of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Dookie College, VIC 3647, Australia.
Hassan KhanakiSchool of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Dookie College, VIC 3647, Australia.
Imtiaz Hussain RajaDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1986-1161
Anshan ShanInstitute of Animal Nutrition, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.

Funding

Key Laboratory of Tarim Animal Husbandry Science and Technology, Xinjiang Production & Construction Group HS202101National Natural Science Foundation of China 31160472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of replacing maize silage (MZS) with high-sugar sorghum silage (HSS) or forage sorghum silage (FSS) without additional grain supplement in the diets of dairy cows on nutrient digestibility, milk composition, nitrogen (N) use, and rumen fermentation. Twenty-four Chinese Holstein cows (545 ± 42.8 kg; 21.41 ± 0.62 kg milk yield; 150 ± 5.6 days in milk) were randomly assigned to three dietary treatments

Indexed as

high sugar sorghumHolstein cowsmaize silagemilknitrogen use efficiency

Identifiers

PMID38891748
PMCPMC11171229

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.