Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38895240›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Distinct computational mechanisms of uncertainty processing explain opposing exploratory behaviors in anxiety and apathy.

Xinyuan Yan, R Becket Ebitz, Nicola Grissom, David P Darrow, Alexander B Herman

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinyuan YanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3373-330X
R Becket EbitzDepartment of Neuroscience, Universite de Montreal, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1J4, Canada.
Nicola GrissomDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 E River Rd, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
David P DarrowDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Alexander B HermanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6229-433X

Funding

Neural Basis of Effortful Decision MakingK23DA050909 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HERMAN, ALEXANDER · 2021 to 2025
$931k
Computational dissociation of the causes of cognitive rigidity in depressionR21MH127607 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HERMAN, ALEXANDER · 2022 to 2023
$423k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA050909NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH127607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision-making in uncertain environments often leads to varied outcomes. Understanding how individuals interpret the causes of unexpected feedback is crucial for adaptive behavior and mental well-being. Uncertainty can be broadly categorized into two components: volatility and stochasticity. Volatility is about how quickly conditions change, impacting results. Stochasticity, on the other hand, refers to outcomes affected by random chance or "luck". Understanding these factors enables individuals to have more effective environmental analysis and strategy implementation (explore or exploit) for future decisions. This study investigates how anxiety and apathy, two prevalent affective states, influence the perceptions of uncertainty and exploratory behavior. Participants (N = 1001) completed a restless three-armed bandit task that was analyzed using latent state models. Anxious individuals perceived uncertainty as more volatile, leading to

Indexed as

anxietyapathyexplorationmanifoldstochasticityuncertaintyvolatility

Identifiers

PMID38895240
PMCPMC11185698

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.