ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Genomic alterations and transcriptional phenotypes in circulating tumor DNA and matched metastatic tumor.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Profiling circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become a fundamental practice in cancer medicine, but the effectiveness of cfDNA at elucidating tumor-derived molecular features has not been systematically compared to standard single-lesion tumor biopsies in prospective cohorts of patients. The use of plasma instead of tissue to guide therapy is particularly attractive for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), a cancer whose aggressive clinical course making it exceedingly challenging to obtain tumor biopsies. Methods: Here, a prospective cohort of 49 plasma samples obtained before, during, and after treatment from 20 patients with recurrent SCLC, we study cfDNA low pass whole genome (0.1X coverage) and exome (130X) sequencing in comparison with time-point matched tumor, characterized using exome and transcriptome sequencing. Results: Direct comparison of cfDNA versus tumor biopsy reveals that cfDNA not only mirrors the mutation and copy number landscape of the corresponding tumor but also identifies clinically relevant resistance mechanisms and cancer driver alterations not found in matched tumor biopsies. Longitudinal cfDNA analysis reliably tracks tumor response, progression, and clonal evolution. Genomic sequencing coverage of plasma DNA fragments around transcription start sites shows distinct treatment-related changes and captures the expression of key transcription factors such as NEUROD1 and REST in the corresponding SCLC tumors, allowing prediction of SCLC neuroendocrine phenotypes and treatment responses. Conclusions: These findings have important implications for non-invasive stratification and subtype-specific therapies for patients with SCLC, now treated as a single disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.