Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38895699›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

The importance of multimodal CT examination in stroke mimics diagnosis: design of prospective observational multicentre study.

Kateřina Dvorníková, Veronika Kunešová, Marcela Ely, Svatopluk Ostrý, Martin Čábal, Martin Reiser, Linda Machová, Markéta Pavlínová, Adéla Kondé, Pavel Eliáš and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06045455 (The Importance of Multimodal CT Examination in Stroke Mimics Diagnosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06045455 recruitingnot on this map

The Importance of Multimodal CT Examination in Stroke Mimics Diagnosis: a Prospective Observational Multicenter Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital OstravaRan2023 to 2026Enrolled3,000ConditionsStroke MimicsArmsMultimodal brain CT, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kateřina DvorníkováDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Veronika KunešováDepartment of Imaging Methods, Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava of University, Ostrava, Czechia.
Marcela ElyDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Svatopluk OstrýHospital in České Budejovice A.S., České Budějovice, Czechia.
Martin ČábalDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Martin ReiserHospital in České Budejovice A.S., České Budějovice, Czechia.
Linda MachováDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Markéta PavlínováHospital in České Budejovice A.S., České Budějovice, Czechia.
Adéla KondéDepartment of the Deputy Director for Science, Research and Education, University Hospital in Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Pavel EliášDepartment of Imaging Methods, Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava of University, Ostrava, Czechia.
Tomáš JonsztaDepartment of Imaging Methods, Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava of University, Ostrava, Czechia.
Jaroslav HavelkaDepartment of Imaging Methods, Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava of University, Ostrava, Czechia.
Ondrej VolnýDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Michal Bar *Department of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography are the gold standard in neuroimaging diagnostics in the case of suspected stroke. CT perfusion (CTP) may play an important role in the diagnosis of stroke mimics (SM), but currently, it is not a standard part of the stroke diagnostic procedure. The project is a multicentre prospective observational clinical research focused on refining the diagnostics of stroke and stroke mimics (SM) in hospital care. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the degree of specificity and sensitivity of multimodal CT (NCCT, CTA, and CTP) in the diagnosis of SM versus stroke. Methodology: In this study, we will include 3,000 patients consecutively admitted to the comprehensive stroke centres with a diagnosis of suspected stroke. On the basis of clinical parameters and the results of multimodal CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the diagnosis of stroke and SM will be established. To clarify the significance of the use of the multimodal CT scan, the analysis will include a comparison of the blinded results for each imaging scan performed by radiologists and AI technology and a comparison of the initial and final diagnosis of the enrolled patients. Based on our results, we will compare the economic indicators and costs that would be saved by not providing inadequate treatment to patients with SM. Conclusion: The expected outcome is to present an optimised diagnostic procedure that results in a faster and more accurate diagnosis, thereby eliminating the risk of inadequate treatment in patients with SM. Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT06045455.

Indexed as

CT perfusionMRImultimodal CTstrokestroke mimics

Identifiers

PMID38895699
PMCPMC11184135

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.