SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024
Endovascular thrombectomy with or without intravenous alteplase in large-core ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large Core Stroke Thrombectomy Is Safe and Effective Regardless of Prior Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Treatment: A Secondary Analysis of the Randomized TENSION Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Trial
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase before endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in treating large core ischemic stroke remains uncertain. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes and safety of EVT with or without bridging IVT in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO) and baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≤ 5. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception until November 2023. The primary outcome was 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2). Secondary outcomes included 90-day independent ambulation (mRS 0-3), successful recanalization, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH (sICH) and 90-day mortality. A random-effects model was used for data pooling. Five high-quality studies, incorporating 2124 patients (41% treated with bridging IVT), were included. Across both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, no significant differences were found between the bridging IVT and EVT-alone groups in terms of functional independence (odds ratios [OR] = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-2.07, P = 0.14; adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.68-2.09, P = 0.53) or independent ambulation (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.80-1.62, P = 0.47; aOR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00-1.39, P = 0.05) at 90 days. Furthermore, no differences were observed in successful recanalization, any ICH, sICH, and 90-day mortality between the two treatment groups. Bridging IVT exhibits similar functional and safety outcomes compared to EVT alone in ACLVO patients with baseline ASPECTS ≤ 5. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38896187What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.