Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38896343›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024

Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of mecA - positive oxacillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolated from patients with bloodstream infection in a tertiary hospital in Southern Brazil.

Felipe Crepaldi Duarte, Anna Paula Silva Olak, Stefani Lino Cardim, Tiago Danelli, Gerusa Luciana Gomes Magalhães, Deisy Mara Lima de Oliveira, Julia da Silva Pimenta, Eliana Carolina Vespero, Sueli Fumie Yamada-Ogatta, Marcia Regina Eches Perugini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Felipe Crepaldi DuarteDepartamento de Patologia,Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas,Programa de Pós-graduação em Fisiopatologia Clínica e Laboratorial,, Universidade Estadual de Londrina,, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. crepaldifelipe@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5167-9314
Anna Paula Silva OlakDepartamento de Patologia,Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas,Programa de Pós-graduação em Fisiopatologia Clínica e Laboratorial,, Universidade Estadual de Londrina,, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Stefani Lino CardimDepartamento de Patologia,Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas,Programa de Pós-graduação em Fisiopatologia Clínica e Laboratorial,, Universidade Estadual de Londrina,, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Tiago DanelliDepartamento de Patologia,Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas,Programa de Pós-graduação em Fisiopatologia Clínica e Laboratorial,, Universidade Estadual de Londrina,, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Gerusa Luciana Gomes MagalhãesDepartamento de Patologia,Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas,Programa de Pós-graduação em Fisiopatologia Clínica e Laboratorial,, Universidade Estadual de Londrina,, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Deisy Mara Lima de OliveiraDepartamento de Patologia,Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas,Programa de Pós-graduação em Fisiopatologia Clínica e Laboratorial,, Universidade Estadual de Londrina,, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Julia da Silva PimentaDepartamento de Patologia,Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas,Programa de Pós-graduação em Fisiopatologia Clínica e Laboratorial,, Universidade Estadual de Londrina,, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Eliana Carolina VesperoDepartamento de Patologia,Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas,Programa de Pós-graduação em Fisiopatologia Clínica e Laboratorial,, Universidade Estadual de Londrina,, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Sueli Fumie Yamada-OgattaDepartamento de Patologia,Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas,Programa de Pós-graduação em Fisiopatologia Clínica e Laboratorial,, Universidade Estadual de Londrina,, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Marcia Regina Eches PeruginiDepartamento de Patologia,Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas,Programa de Pós-graduação em Fisiopatologia Clínica e Laboratorial,, Universidade Estadual de Londrina,, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus are extremely important microorganisms, either from an epidemiological point of view or as a pathogen, responsible for causing a series of infectious processes, whether simple, restricted to the skin, or invasive infections such as bacteremia. The emergence of Oxacillin Sensitive-Methicillin Resistant S.aureus (OS-MRSA) isolates has imposed difficulties in the treatment of patients with staphylococcal infection, as such isolates can be mistakenly classified as sensitive and lead to failure of the therapy used. Thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate the prevalence, and genotypic and phenotypic characteristics, of OS-MRSA isolates, from bloodstream infections, collected from patients admitted to a hospital in southern Brazil, as well as to evaluate the treatment used. For this, 801 unique isolates of S. aureus, collected from blood cultures, between January 2011 and December 2020 were evaluated. Of these, 96 isolates were classified as sensitive to oxacillin. The isolates were identified and had their sensitivity profile performed by manual and automated methods. The minimum inhibitory concentration for vancomycin, daptomycin, oxacillin, linezolid and teicoplanine was performed by e-test. The mecA, vanA genes, typing of the SCCmec elements, as well as the search for the icaA, tst-1 and pvl virulence genes were performed by PCR. Biofilm formation was performed using the crystal violet technique. The Sequence Type (ST), as well as the Clonal Complex (CC) of the isolates was evaluated by the RTq -PCR. The clinical characteristics of the patients were evaluated through an active search in medical records. After investigating the mecA gene, 27.1% (26/96) of the isolates were considered OS-MRSA, with SCCmec type I being the most prevalent, 46.1% (12/26). Among the evaluated isolates, 41% (9/22) were included in CC5 and ST9. As for virulence, all isolates were positive for the icaA gene and characterized as strong biofilm formers. The pvl gene was found in 92.3% (24/26) of the isolates and the toxic shock syndrome toxin was present in 61.5% of the isolates (16/26). All isolates were negative for the presence of the van A gene. As for the clinical outcome, 73% (19/26) of the patients were discharged from the hospital and 27% (7/26) died. It was possible to observe a high frequency of OS-MRSA isolates causing bloodstream infections. Furthermore, such isolates contain several virulence genes, which may contribute to a worse clinical outcome.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBacterial ProteinsGenotypeMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOxacillinPenicillin-Binding ProteinsStaphylococcal InfectionsTertiary Care CentersBrazilHumansPhenotypeAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsmecA protein, Staphylococcus aureusOxacillinPenicillin-Binding ProteinsBacterial resistanceOS-MRSASepsisStaphylococcal infectionVirulence

Identifiers

PMID38896343
PMCPMC11405550

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.