Evidence mapPaperPMID 38896403Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2024

Evaluation of the Tolerability of Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitors in the Treatment of Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review of Treatment Strategies.

Aaron S Farberg, Dustin Portela, Divya Sharma, Meenal Kheterpal

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00833417 phase2completednot on this map

A Pivotal Phase II, Multicenter, Single-arm, Two-cohort Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of GDC-0449 in Patients With Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenentech, Inc.Ran2009 to 2014Enrolled104ConditionsBasal Cell CarcinomaArmsVismodegib 150 mg
NCT01327053 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II, Randomized Double-blind Study of Efficacy and Safety of Two Dose Levels of LDE225 in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2011 to 2018Enrolled230ConditionsBasal Cell CarcinomaArmsLDE225
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aaron S FarbergSection of Dermatology, Baylor Scott & White Health System, Dallas, TX, USA. aaron.farberg@gmail.com.
Dustin PortelaTreasure Valley Dermatology, Boise, ID, USA.
Divya SharmaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Meenal KheterpalDepartment of Dermatology, Duke Health, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs) have broadened the treatment options available for patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) for whom traditional therapeutic approaches are not feasible or effective. Sonidegib and vismodegib are oral HHIs that were approved for treatment of patients with advanced BCC after demonstrating promising efficacy in the pivotal Phase II BOLT (NCT01327053) and ERIVANCE (NCT00833417) trials, respectively. However, the incidence and types of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) observed with these agents may limit continuous use of HHIs and ultimately impact clinical outcomes. In this review, we summarize the safety and tolerability profiles of sonidegib and vismodegib and discuss potential management strategies for HHI class-effect AEs, including muscle spasms, creatine phosphokinase increase, alopecia, and dysgeusia. These AEs primarily occur early in treatment and can lead to treatment discontinuation. Differences in the pharmacokinetic profiles of sonidegib and vismodegib may contribute to the variability noted in times to onset and resolution of these and other AEs. Evidence suggests that protocol modifications, such as treatment interruptions and dose reductions, are effective ways to manage AEs while maintaining disease control. Nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions may also be considered as part of an AE management strategy. Overall, healthcare providers and patients with advanced BCC should be aware of the HHI class-effect AEs and plan effective management strategies to avoid treatment discontinuation and optimize therapeutic response.

Indexed as

AnilidesAntineoplastic AgentsBasal Cell CarcinomaBiphenyl CompoundsHedgehog ProteinsPyridinesSkin NeoplasmsAlopeciaClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDysgeusiaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSignal TransductionTreatment OutcomeAnilidesAntineoplastic AgentsBiphenyl CompoundsHedgehog ProteinsHhAntag691Pyridinessonidegib

Identifiers

PMID38896403
PMCPMC11358199

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.