Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38899345›Full record

SynthesisHaematologica2024

Clinical impact of clonal hematopoiesis in hematopoietic cell transplantation: a review, meta-analysis, and call to action.

Nancy Gillis, Amr Ebied, Zachary J Thompson, Joseph A Pidala

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Haematologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nancy GillisDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States; Department of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL. Nancy.Gillis@moffitt.org.
Amr EbiedDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Zachary J ThompsonDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
Joseph A PidalaDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI John L. Cleveland · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only potentially curative treatment option for many patients with hematologic malignancies. While HCT outcomes have improved drastically over the years, patients and clinicians continue to face numerous survivorship challenges, such as relapse, graft-versus-host disease, and secondary malignancies. Recent literature suggests that clonal hematopoiesis (CH), the presence of a recurrent somatic mutation in hematopoietic cells, in HCT patients or donors may be associated with outcomes in autologous and allogeneic HCT. Herein, we perform a review of the literature and summarize reported associations between CH and clinical outcomes in HCT. For commonly reported outcomes, we used meta-analysis methods to provide estimates of effect sizes when combining results. A total of 32 articles with relevant and independent contributions were included, covering both autologous (N=19) and allogeneic (N=13) HCT. The articles report variable risk for developing outcomes according to CH characteristics, patient disease status, and method of HCT. Using meta-analysis of available results, HCT outcomes with statistically significant effects by CH status include therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (odds ratio =3.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.18-6.10) and overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]=1.38; 95% CI: 1.20-1.58) in autologous HCT and relapse (HR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.68-0.94) in allogeneic HCT. However, heterogeneity, biases, and limitations in the literature provide challenges for informing the translation of CH to clinical decision- making. We conclude with a call to action and discussion of next steps to build upon the current literature and provide granularity to the true clinical impact of CH in the setting of HCT.

Indexed as

Clonal HematopoiesisHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationGraft vs Host DiseaseHematologic NeoplasmsHumansTransplantation, HomologousTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38899345
PMCPMC11609801

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.