Evidence mapPaperPMID 38903803Full record

ArticleHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2024

Health behavior interventions among people with lower socio-economic position: a scoping review of behavior change techniques and effectiveness.

Loes van den Bekerom, Laurens C van Gestel, Jan W Schoones, Jet Bussemaker, Marieke A Adriaanse

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Loes van den BekeromHealth Campus The Hague/Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague/Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5375-7352
Laurens C van GestelHealth, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-4301
Jan W SchoonesDirectorate of Research Policy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1120-4781
Jet BussemakerHealth Campus The Hague/Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague/Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7496-1627
Marieke A AdriaanseHealth Campus The Hague/Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague/Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2218-4723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Behavior change interventions can unintendedly widen existing socio-economic health inequalities. Understanding why interventions are (in)effective among people with lower socio-economic position (SEP) is essential. Therefore, this scoping review aims to describe what is reported about the behavior change techniques (BCTs) applied within interventions and their effectiveness in encouraging physical activity and healthy eating, and reducing smoking and alcohol consumption according to SEP. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in 12 electronic databases, and 151 studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included and coded for health behavioral outcomes, SEP-operationalization, BCTs (type and number) and effectiveness. Results: Findings suggest that approaches for measuring, defining and substantiating lower SEP vary. Current studies of behavior change interventions for people of different SEP do not systematically identify BCTs, making systematic evaluation of BCT effectiveness impossible. The effectiveness of interventions is mainly evaluated by overall intervention outcomes and SEP-moderation effects are mostly not assessed. Conclusion: Using different SEP-operationalizations and not specifying BCTs hampers systematic evidence accumulation regarding effective (combinations of) BCTs for the low SEP population. To learn which BCTs effectively improve health behaviors among people with lower SEP, future intervention developers should justify how SEP is operationalized and must systematically describe and examine BCTs.

Indexed as

health behavior interventions; behavior change techniques (BCTs); socio-economic position (SEP); healthy eating; scoping review

Identifiers

PMID38903803
PMCPMC11188964

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.