Evidence mapPaperPMID 38907239Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2024

The impact of antifibrotic use on long-term clinical outcomes in the pulmonary fibrosis foundation registry.

Cathryn T Lee, Wei Hao, Cindy A Burg, Jennie Best, Giselle E Kolenic, Mary E Strek

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cathryn T LeeSection of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. cathryn.lee@bsd.uchicago.edu.
Wei HaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Statistical Analysis of Biomedical and Educational Research Group (SABER), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Cindy A BurgU.S. Medical Affairs, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jennie BestU.S. Medical Affairs, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Giselle E KolenicDepartment of Biostatistics, Statistical Analysis of Biomedical and Educational Research Group (SABER), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Mary E StrekSection of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

Funding

Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Scholar Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a devastating interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a high mortality rate. The antifibrotic medications pirfenidone and nintedanib have been in use since 2014 for this disorder and are associated with improved rate of lung function decline. Less is known about their long-term outcomes outside of the clinical trial context.

methodsThe Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry was used for this study. Patients with an IPF diagnosis made within a year of enrollment were included. The treated group was defined as patients receiving either pirfenidone or nintedanib for at least 180 days. The untreated group did not have any record of antifibrotic use. Demographic data, comorbidities, serial lung function, hospitalization, and vital status data were collected from the registry database. The primary outcomes were transplant-free survival, time to first respiratory hospitalization, and time to 10% absolute FVC decline. Time-to-event analyses were performed utilizing Cox proportional hazards models and the log-rank test. Model covariates included age, gender, smoking history, baseline lung function, comorbidities, and oxygen use.

resultsThe registry contained 1212 patients with IPF; ultimately 288 patients met inclusion criteria for the treated group, and 101 patients were designated as untreated. Patients treated with antifibrotics were significantly younger (69.8 vs. 72.6 years, p = 0.008) and less likely to have smoked (61.1% ever smokers vs. 72.3% never smokers, p = 0.04). No significant differences were seen in race, gender, comorbidities, or baseline pulmonary function between groups. The primary outcome of transplant-free survival was not significantly different between the two groups (adjusted HR 0.799, 95% CI 0.534-1.197, p = 0.28). Time to respiratory hospitalization was significantly shorter in the treated group (adjusted HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.05-4.30, p = 0.04). No significant difference in time to pulmonary function decline was seen between groups.

conclusionsThis multicenter study demonstrated 63% of newly diagnosed IPF patients had continuous antifibrotic usage. Antifibrotics were not associated with improved transplant-free survival or pulmonary function change but was associated with an increased hazard of respiratory hospitalization. Future studies should further investigate the role of antifibrotic therapy in clinically important outcomes in real-world patients with IPF and other progressive ILDs.

Indexed as

Antifibrotic AgentsIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisIndolesPyridonesRegistriesAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntifibrotic AgentsIndolesnintedanibpirfenidonePyridonesAntifibroticInterstitial lung diseaseNintedanibPirfenidone

Identifiers

PMID38907239
PMCPMC11193272

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.