ArticleJournal of virological methods2024
Product Enhanced Reverse Transcriptase for assessing replication competent virus in vectors retroviral vectors pseudotyped with GALV and VSV-G envelopes.
Article in Journal of virological methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluated the use of the Product Enhanced Reverse Transcriptase (PERT) assay as a means of detecting virus in retroviral vectors products pseudotyped with Gibbon Ape Leukemia Virus (GALV) and Vesicular Stomatitis Virus G (VSVG) envelopes. PERT provides greater standardization than the S+/L- assay which has been used extensively in virus detection. A challenge is that PERT will also detect residual retroviral vectors as vector particles contain reverse transcriptase. Vector products were cultured for 3 weeks on HEK293 cells to amplify any potential virus. In addition, vector supernatant and end-of-production cells were spiked with GALV to evaluate for inhibition by the test article. Results of PERT and the S+/L- assay were compared. PERT and S+/L- assays were both effective in detecting virus. Vector supernatants were negative at the end of 3 weeks of culture by PERT for both GAVL and VSVG pseudotyped vector. In contrast, end-of-production cells were positive by PERT due to persistent vector producing cells. A one-week culture of cell-free media obtained at the 3 weeks timepoint allowed distinction of virus-free test articles from those with virus. The PERT assay is suitable for detecting replication competent retrovirus in vector products pseudotyped with GALV and VSVG envelopes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.