Evidence mapPaperPMID 38909200Full record

ReviewBMC primary care2024

BETTER LIFE- guidelines for chronic disease preventive care for people aged 18-39 years: a literature review.

Nasheed Moqueet, Sylvie D Cornacchi, Jesmin Antony, Ielaf Khalil, Donna Manca, Carolina Fernandes, Lawrence Paszat, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Eva Grunfeld, Nicolette Sopcak and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Nasheed MoqueetPublic Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sylvie D CornacchiMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jesmin AntonyWomen's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
Ielaf KhalilLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Donna MancaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Carolina FernandesDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Lawrence PaszatSunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kris Aubrey-BasslerPrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Eva GrunfeldOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nicolette SopcakDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Andrew PintoLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jill KonkinDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Candace NykiforukSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Linda RabeneckInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter SelbyCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Becky WallDurham Region Health Department, Whitby, ON, Canada.
Mary Ann O'Brien *Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Aisha Lofters *Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada. aisha.lofters@wchospital.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe original 'BETTER' (Building on Existing Tools To Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care) approach consisted of a prevention-focused visit between participants aged 40-65 years and a "Prevention Practitioner" (PP), who empowered the participant to set achievable prevention and screening goals for cancers and chronic diseases. BETTER was successfully adapted for economically deprived communities (BETTER HEALTH) in Canada. Our objective was to conduct a review of guidelines in preparation for adapting the 'BETTER HEALTH' approach for younger adults aged 18-39 years living with lower income, a group known to have earlier mortality due to a higher prevalence of preventable chronic diseases than their peers with higher income.

methodsWe searched multiple electronic databases and grey literature for clinical practice guidelines on prevention/screening and included those that met the following criteria: published in English from 2008-2020 in Canada or any of the following countries (Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, Scotland, United States and England); and addressed prevention or screening. We assessed quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool and extracted data (publication details, recommendations, and Quality/Level of evidence as reported by authors) from sources with overall scores of 5 or higher. Final recommendations were compiled after harmonization with input from diverse stakeholders (co-investigators, PPs, and the Community Advisory Committee).

resultsWe included a total of 85 guidelines, and developed a final list of 42 recommendations for 18-39 year-olds across 21 topics. Specific recommendations fell under the following topics: cancers, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, lifestyle (alcohol; healthy nutrition/physical activity); healthy relationships and healthy sexuality, immunization, oral health, social determinants of health, and substance use.

conclusionWe identified evidence-based guidelines on individual-level prevention/screening actions for adults 18-39 years old and relevant for those living with lower income which will directly inform development and implementation of the BETTER LIFE intervention.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdolescentAdultChronic DiseaseHumansMass ScreeningPreventive Health ServicesPrimary Health CareYoung AdultHealth promotionPreventionScreening

Identifiers

PMID38909200
PMCPMC11193284

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.