Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38912201›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's health2024

Benefits of Resistance Training During Pregnancy for Maternal and Fetal Health: A Brief Overview.

Cathryn Duchette, Madhawa Perera, Scott Arnett, Erin White, Elizabeth Belcher, Rachel Tinius

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Rethinking Prenatal and Postpartum Exercise.Delaware journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cathryn DuchetteAlabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, Alabama, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7604-0290
Madhawa PereraSchool of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2040-0362
Scott ArnettSchool of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA.
Erin WhiteHealth, Exercise, and Rehabilitative Sciences, Winona State University, Winona, Minnesota, USA.
Elizabeth BelcherSchool of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA.
Rachel TiniusSchool of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3061-3997

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research demonstrates resistance training is not only safe but also beneficial for pregnant women. However, exercise recommendations for pregnant women still minimize the importance of resistance exercise and provide minimal guidance. With a large increase in strength-focused sports among women, it is critical to re-evaluate the risk/benefit ratio of these exercises and ensure the latest recommendations reflect the latest clinical research. The purpose of this review is to highlight the safety and benefits of resistance training for both maternal and fetal health, particularly focusing on recent work. Relevant research involving resistance training during pregnancy was accessed and analyzed via a quasi-systematic search. Results demonstrate that appropriate prenatal resistance training can help alleviate some of the common symptoms of pregnancy, such as fatigue, back pain, and poor mental health. Resistance exercise can assist with glucose control in gestational diabetes mellitus, as well as decrease the risk of infant macrosomia and childhood metabolic dysfunction associated with uncontrolled gestational diabetes. Resistance training can also increase the likelihood of a vaginal delivery, which is beneficial for both mother and baby. Concerning fetal health, resistance training increases uterine blood flow, decreases the risk of neonatal macrosomia, and improves cognitive function and metabolic health in childhood. As with all forms of exercise, pregnant women should avoid resistance exercises that involve the supine position for extended bouts of time, trauma (or risk of trauma) to the abdomen, ballistic movements, movements that rely heavily on balance, and conditions that prohibit appropriate temperature control. With these considerations in mind, resistance training's benefits far surpass the lack of risk to the fetus. Resistance training is a safe and effective way to improve and maintain physical fitness during pregnancy and represents no risk to fetal health and development. Thus, healthcare providers should recommend resistance training for pregnant women.

Indexed as

gestational diabeteslabor & deliverymacrosomiastrength training

Identifiers

PMID38912201
PMCPMC11193983

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.