Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38914694›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

The substitute ENSO 16 has low impact on glucose metabolism in healthy humans: a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, cross-over trial.

Martin Lutnik, Stefan Weisshaar, Lena M Mussbacher, Daniel Steiner, Michael Wolzt

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martin LutnikDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. martin.lutnik@meduniwien.ac.at.
Stefan WeisshaarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lena M MussbacherNEOH Alpha Republic GmbH, Rooseveltplatz 11/1, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Daniel SteinerDepartment of Hematology and Hemastaseology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael WolztDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High sugar consumption is associated with cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. Current sugar substitutes may cause taste sensations and gastrointestinal symptoms. ENSO 16 is a combination of 16 different sugar substitutes and plant fibers and has been designed as a sugar alternative. The impact on plasma glucose metabolism as well as on gastrointestinal tolerance has not been investigated yet. 17 healthy participants were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind trial. Participants received a single oral dose of 30 g glucose or 30 g ENSO 16 and crossed over to the alternate treatment after a 7 day wash out period. The study endpoint was the effect on plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide concentrations and gastrointestinal disorders. A questionnaire regarding gastrointestinal symptoms was used for individual subjective scoring. The mean baseline adjusted plasma glucose AUC

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseC-PeptideCross-Over StudiesInsulinAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGlucoseHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBlood GlucoseC-PeptideGlucoseInsulinDietary productsGastric symptomsGlucose metabolismNatural sweetenersPlant fibersSugar substitute

Identifiers

PMID38914694
PMCPMC11196703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.