Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38916620›Full record

ReviewUpdates in surgery2025

The aim of donor safety: surgical approaches and current results.

Christian Tibor Josef Magyar, Woo Jin Choi, Zhihao Li, Mark Steven Cattral, Nazia Selzner, Anand Ghanekar, Blayne Amir Sayed, Gonzalo Sapisochin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian Tibor Josef Magyar *Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4570-949X
Woo Jin Choi *Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4456-6500
Zhihao LiDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5654-7043
Mark Steven CattralDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8416-9660
Nazia SelznerDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9435-2597
Anand GhanekarDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Blayne Amir SayedDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3224-8871
Gonzalo SapisochinDepartment of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Gonzalo.sapisochin@uhn.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9527-8723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living liver donation (LLD) has been suggested as a potential solution to reduce the waitlist mortality for liver transplantation (LT) recipients by facilitating living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Ensuring both donor and recipient safety is a critical aspect of LDLT. An accurate understanding of the complexity and extend of safety outcomes of the donor is imperative to maintain the high-quality standard this medical program requires. This review seeks to outline safety outcome parameters of interest for donors. Early postoperative mortality is very low with no significant differences comparing left lobe to right lobe LLD. Complications most commonly are biliary (leakage or strictures), bleeding, respiratory or pulmonary, gastrointestinal or infectious. Return to full-time work and quality of life are essential parameters in the mid and long term. As evidence continues to accumulate, outcomes may evolve with the expansion of minimal invasive surgery practice and currently laparoscopic approach is recommended in large experienced centers. By offering safer operations that require fewer incisions or liver resections, living liver donations can be further encouraged, and the perception of the procedure can be improved. Rational consideration of the safety of the donor and in-depth discussion and evaluation with the patient is of utmost importance.

Indexed as

HepatectomyLiver TransplantationLiving DonorsPatient SafetyHumansLaparoscopyPostoperative ComplicationsComplicationDonor safetyLiving donorMinimal invasive surgeryOutcomeTransplantation

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.